Wireless Network

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by jpcummins, Mar 18, 2023.

  1. jpcummins

    jpcummins Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Posts:
    630
    Location:
    Terre Haute, IN
    I recently downloaded a program, Wireless Network Watcher, from NirSoft. When I tested the program for malware, VitusTotal, 8 security vendors identified malware. However, I understand from other sites that the software is safe. Has anyone else experienced this? If so did you install the program or not? I would like to believe VirusTotal is reporting false positives but... As always I would appreciate all replies and would thank you in advance.

    John
     
  2. Buddel

    Buddel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2015
    Posts:
    1,951
    I've been using Wireless Network Watcher for ages. It's definitely safe to use and I couldn't care less what VT says.
     
  3. zapjb

    zapjb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Posts:
    5,557
    Location:
    USA still the best. But barely.
    I trust NirSoft.
     
  4. FanJ

    FanJ Updates Team

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,660
    In short and in general:
    There are programs that could be used for good intensions and could be used for bad intensions.
    Some AV's flag those programs as "potential unsafe" (or some other wording like that).
    It is the user who has to decide here.

    I know that this is a bit short on the topic (generally speaking) but it gives an idea (I hope).
     
  5. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,062
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    FYI. https://www.nirsoft.net/faq.html
     
  6. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    8,626
    I just download and scanned it. I clicked Reanalyze file, so that it would be scanned again and it's now detected by 7 scanners. However, when scanning files at VirusTotal, it's important to take note of what a file is classified as. Two antiviruses correctly detected as being potentially unwanted (a PUP), or riskware. Both of these detections indicate that it's not malware. That leaves five antiviruses that detect it as being malicious. However, they are all heuristic detections. Antiviruses use heuristics to analyse a file and look for potentially suspicious behaviours. This can lead to false positives, as there are behaviours that can be used by both legitimate software and malware. A heuristic detection does not mean that a file is definitely malicious, it just means that it's a possibility. Of course in this case, as others have explained this isn't malicious. VirusTotal says that the file was first scanned two days. It's quite possible that in the next few days the detection rate will drop as antivirus vendors fix the false positives and no longer wrongly detect it.
     
  7. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,931
    nirsoft ever was defeated by some antivirus tools - because its coded very close to system functions and its usage can also be abused (ns tools are able to got run with invisible window). such false positives exist since decades for nirsoft.
     
  8. TairikuOkami

    TairikuOkami Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Posts:
    3,440
    Location:
    Slovakia
    Nirsoft tools contain vulnerabilities that can be abused by malware and they refuse to fix them, so while I use them, I do not trust them, I take it as running a crack, while usefull, not really safe.

    https://borncity.com/win/2020/04/16/dll-hijacking-vulnerabilities-in-nirsoft-tools/
    Nirsoft tools are portable, only a few require you to install a driver.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.