Win XP, 2K...

Discussion in 'polls' started by sir_carew, Sep 4, 2004.

?

Which?

  1. Windows XP

    17 vote(s)
    77.3%
  2. Windows 2000

    5 vote(s)
    22.7%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sir_carew

    sir_carew Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Posts:
    884
    Location:
    Santiago, Chile
    Which is best?
    I prefer 2k, it's more stable, use less resources, etc.
     
  2. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,873
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    The reason xp was created was because it is the most secure and stable version of windows ever written. and it is getting better all of the time. ;)
     
  3. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,729
    Location:
    Texas
    XP for me. Warts and all.
     
  4. MikeBCda

    MikeBCda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Posts:
    1,627
    Location:
    southern Ont. Canada
    I had to abstain from voting on this one -- jumped straight from 98SE to XP simply because XP was all that was available on new systems here when my old mobo died of old age last year.

    What I miss most about 98SE (and my apologies for this being a little off-topic with regard to 2K vs. XP) was its ability to handle quite a few DOS programs, often nicely running even some fairly demanding ones in DOS windows without having to reboot.
     
  5. nod32_9

    nod32_9 Guest

    My HD's throughput speed is faster with XP. That said, I would go with W2K in a split second if I should decide to get an ATA controller card (bypasses the IDE).
     
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. Joxx
    Replies:
    22
    Views:
    4,332
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.