Win XP, 2K...

Discussion in 'polls' started by sir_carew, Sep 4, 2004.

?

Which?

  1. Windows XP

    17 vote(s)
    77.3%
  2. Windows 2000

    5 vote(s)
    22.7%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sir_carew

    sir_carew Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Posts:
    884
    Location:
    Santiago, Chile
    Which is best?
    I prefer 2k, it's more stable, use less resources, etc.
     
  2. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,894
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    The reason xp was created was because it is the most secure and stable version of windows ever written. and it is getting better all of the time. ;)
     
  3. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    64,271
    Location:
    Texas
    XP for me. Warts and all.
     
  4. MikeBCda

    MikeBCda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Posts:
    1,627
    Location:
    southern Ont. Canada
    I had to abstain from voting on this one -- jumped straight from 98SE to XP simply because XP was all that was available on new systems here when my old mobo died of old age last year.

    What I miss most about 98SE (and my apologies for this being a little off-topic with regard to 2K vs. XP) was its ability to handle quite a few DOS programs, often nicely running even some fairly demanding ones in DOS windows without having to reboot.
     
  5. nod32_9

    nod32_9 Guest

    My HD's throughput speed is faster with XP. That said, I would go with W2K in a split second if I should decide to get an ATA controller card (bypasses the IDE).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.