Win 2K ESET Kernal...Virus Scanner Initialization Failed...

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus' started by OARS2, Feb 26, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. OARS2

    OARS2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    4
    This started happening a few days ago starting with one 2K box, then the next day one more dropped, Now I have a 2K server box that dropped. Wondering if anyone else had an issue with this…I upgraded to 3.0.621.0 a few weeks ago…with no issues. Suddenly things are going wrong. Any help, thoughts, or ideas?

    Column Name Value
    Event Id Event 21267
    Client Name Server
    Computer Name Server
    MAC Address *******
    Primary Server Server
    Date Received 2008-02-26 08:00:17
    Date Occurred 2008-02-26 07:58:54
    Level Critical Warning
    Plugin ESET Kernel
    Event Virus scanner initialization failed. Antivirus protection will not function properly.



    I have placed a service call on this, was on hold for 40 mins…then ended up having to leave a message…still no call back.

    Thanks for any help offered!!
     
  2. thanatos_theos

    thanatos_theos Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Posts:
    540
    The latest version is 3.0.642. Install v3.0.642 and see if that solves the problem.

    thanatos
     
  3. OARS2

    OARS2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    4
    Ill have to get at the server at the close of business today...for my end users I had to revert them back to 2.7 just to keep them in the clear. Ill get back to you about the server after I have tried it, I was going to try that this evening anyways. Thanks for the response!
     
  4. OARS2

    OARS2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    4
    Bah...Same thing.

    I heard back from ESET Tech support and they told me that this is a known issues, that their developers are working on it. If/when I hear back from them I'll post back. Thanks thanatos :D

    Cheers!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.