Wikipedia not secure ?

Discussion in 'other security issues & news' started by CloneRanger, Feb 21, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,918
  2. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    Because it contains other content that isn't secured.
     
  3. Spiral123

    Spiral123 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    129
    pedia or media...?
     
  4. Midal Phingar

    Midal Phingar Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Posts:
    1
    Similar to _many_ others with mixed content.

    How about that fine Wilders https://? ;>

    Even Pirate Bay provides that, at least.

    No security for the wicked here, though.
     
  5. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    28,052
    Location:
    U.S.A.
  6. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,102
    Location:
    Outer space
    Mixed content indeed, AdBlockPlus shows all images still served via HTTP instead of HTTPS.
     
  7. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,918
    @ m00nbl00d/BoerenkoolMetWorst

    Hi, thanks ;)

    Seems silly to provide HTTPS then spoil it by allowing HTTP through :thumbd:
     
  8. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    They're not the only ones. :D This Microsoft page also does it -https://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=c3202ce6-4056-4059-8a1b-3a9b77cdfdda&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3a+MicrosoftDownloadCenter+(Microsoft+Download+Center)&pf=true

    If you see its source code, you'll notice 25 (http) insecure content.
     
  9. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,918
    Just checked that Looooong URL :D Yes RED here too :thumbd: Crazy !
     
  10. John Bull

    John Bull Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Posts:
    904
    Location:
    London UK
    I remember reading some time ago on Wikipedia that the data can be altered by a number of sources. Don`t know by how many or who, but that is what it said.

    I always considered Wiki as a fairly accurate source of information, but if unauthorised people can alter the information, then how can it be ?

    If they can tamper with it, they can contaminate it.

    John
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.