Why is 20gb for XP not enough?

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by houndhen, Jan 23, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. houndhen

    houndhen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Posts:
    3
    [solved]Why is 20gb for XP not enough?

    I have been reading on this forum and other places about the right size for an XP partition. I multiboot XP Home and 5 Linux distros on a 250gb hd. I have XP installed is sda1 and it is 20gb. sda2 is a swap file. sda3 is an extended partition that is divided up and this is where the linux distros are installed. I have some unallocated space after sda3. I have used it in the past as sda4 but deleted it and now it is unallocated

    Sda1 holds OS, applications, and data. I do most of my day-to-day work in linux but keep XP because of work that I have to do in Quickbooks. I have started getting warnings about space running out. I have deleted stuff and defragged the hd and now have about 6gb free. I may need to install another version of Quickbooks. I see talk about page file. What is the best size for a page file.?

    I am thinking of buying Paragon Partition Manager to increase the size of sda1. Non of the linux partition managers will do the job on a NTFS partition. My first question is, will PPM do the job with what I have described? That is the unallocated space being after sda3 extended partition.

    Thanks,
    Harold
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2011
  2. Brian K

    Brian K Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Posts:
    9,714
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
    Harold,

    Page File size...

    http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.htm

    If 20 GB is too small it is because you have put a lot of data/apps in the partition. WinXP runs fine in a 2 GB partition. But the partition needs to be larger depending on what you want to install.
     
  3. HAN

    HAN Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    2,098
    Location:
    USA
    ?? Why not?
     
  4. houndhen

    houndhen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Posts:
    3
    From what I read, they can't resize NTFS partitions. You have to use something like Partition Magic. I have it but it gives me error 116 and asks me if I want to fix it. I think it is because of my partitions and grub boot manager being written to MBR. I don't believe that it is an error so I told it not to fix it. From some the forum posts I read if you answer yes it will mess with your partition table and possibly the BIOS.

    Now I am trying to find something else that will resize a NTFS partition.
     
  5. wat0114

    wat0114 Guest

    Linux' GParted will work fine at resizing ntfs partitions. You could also use the excellent and free Partition Wizard boot cd:

    -http://www.partitionwizard.com/partition-wizard-bootable-cd.html
     
  6. Brian K

    Brian K Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Posts:
    9,714
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
  7. Aaron Here

    Aaron Here Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2006
    Posts:
    1,205
    Location:
    USA
    In addition to GParted, Acronis Disk Director Suite uses a Linux boot disk and works like a champ with all Windows' file formats (however it's not a free program)!
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2011
  8. houndhen

    houndhen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Posts:
    3
    Thanks for all the input. I have a copy of Acronis and will look at Partition Wizard. It may be that I just don't know how to get the free space where it needs to be so that sda1 can be enlarged.

    I have gotten a howto about using Bootit NG. It makes sense and seems like it could be a good guideline. I am being cautious because I had rather not mess with my MBR or my partition table. The unallocated space is located beyond sda3 which is an extended partition. It looks like I just have to get it back to just after sda1 so that I can increase the size of sda1.

    I also have Partition Magic but it gave me an error 116 and offered to fix it. I was unsure that it wouldn't mess up my partition table/MBR so I abandoned that idea.

    Thanks again,
    Harold
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.