Who has suffered more

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by trjam, Oct 17, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,057
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Kaspersky with the chk/dsk issue, or Eset with the very long delay of their suite. And which do you think will rebound back quicker.
     
  2. solcroft

    solcroft Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,639
    What's the point of making a thread that's only going to get locked?
     
  3. Mele20

    Mele20 Former Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2002
    Posts:
    2,495
    Location:
    Hilo, Hawaii
    Why does it matter? This is a stupid thread and it will be locked as solcroft pointed out.
     
  4. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,057
    Location:
    North Carolina
    why would it be closed. It is a valid viewpoint.
     
  5. BlueZannetti

    BlueZannetti Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Posts:
    6,590
    It would be closed since absolutely nobody outside of either company has the information required to render an informed comment. Even if sales figures, trial download information, or customer retention statistics were available, you need to do a lot more digging to make a connection with the two items mentioned. Finally, it is pitting a pair of offerings on an adversarial comparison basis. It really isn't any different that "which is best", it's an alternate way of posing that precise question.

    By asking which will rebound quicker, you've already posited information that you simply cannot have. The thread was initiated with an unverifiable premise. In fact, most folks internal to either of these companies won't have that information as yet (if ever) either.

    Thread closed.

    Blue
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.