Which is the heavier Av you ever used?

Discussion in 'polls' started by COMPYPY, Oct 16, 2011.

?

Which av is heavier

  1. Avira

    1.3%
  2. Avast

    2.0%
  3. Avg

    4.0%
  4. Bullguard

    0.7%
  5. Bitdefender

    12.7%
  6. Eset

    1.3%
  7. F-secure

    4.7%
  8. G-data

    10.0%
  9. Kaspersky

    18.0%
  10. Mcafee

    7.3%
  11. Norton

    14.7%
  12. Norman

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  13. Outpost

    0.7%
  14. Panda

    1.3%
  15. Quickheal

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  16. Emsisoft

    5.3%
  17. Sophos

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  18. Trustpost

    3.3%
  19. Trendmicro

    0.7%
  20. Vipre

    0.7%
  21. Webroot

    0.7%
  22. Zonealarm

    2.0%
  23. Pc tool

    1.3%
  24. Kingsoft

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  25. Other (Please specify)

    7.3%
  1. COMPYPY

    COMPYPY Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Posts:
    80
    This poll is for fun and knowledge.Which antivirus is heaviest according to your experience?
     
  2. carat

    carat Guest

    The bloatware award goes to: G Data ;)
     
  3. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,516
    I don't keep them long enough to remember.
     
  4. RJK3

    RJK3 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Posts:
    855
    I've seen plenty on clients' PCs but that doesn't count. From those I'd say McAfee or PC Tools are performance killers, although (as much as I hate to say it) McAfee seems to be improving.

    I tried a number of them on my netbook earlier this year, with the rationale that any speed issues would be obvious on a slower machine. Ordered subjectively from heaviest to lightest:

    Comodo Internet Security (took it off very quickly as it slowed things down substantially, no surprise there)
    Avast free (interacted poorly with MBAM due to known Avast bug, and machine was slow, took it off early)
    Avira (worked well with MBAM, light, but wanted to replace it)
    Panda Cloud Antivirus (lighter)
    F-Secure IS (like not having any antivirus at all)


    Using Vipre actually sped up my comp- no, not really.
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2011
  5. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    I dont think this thread will last long but G-Data with out a doubt.
     
  6. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,434
    Location:
    Europe
    Norman and F-Secure, but I tried them some years ago, I couldn't say now.
     
  7. twl845

    twl845 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Posts:
    4,186
    Location:
    USA
    I have only used Norton, Eset NOD32, and Avast, in that order. It's been years since I used Norton V4 AV, and it basically took over. I really shouldn't vote it as the heaviest, because it has probably slimmed down by now, and I haven't seen any hate posts in ages. I find Avast as the best for me to date.
     
  8. cozumel

    cozumel Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Posts:
    260
    Location:
    London, UK
    I've only ever used Norton back in 2004/2005 and stopped due to seriously slow-down. Haven't used a suite since.
     
  9. Rampastein

    Rampastein Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Posts:
    290
    Must be F-Secure when I used it during 2005 and 2006. I know it's pretty light nowadays though.
     
  10. wtsinnc

    wtsinnc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Posts:
    943
    Mid-2000s Norton has often been mentioned in these forums as the heaviest, but my worst ever experience was with F-Secure AV in 2006.

    Close seconds in my experience are Kaspersky 2010 and Bit Defender 2008/2009.
     
  11. Kerodo

    Kerodo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Posts:
    7,786
    McAfee without a doubt. Never seen anything as bad as that....
     
  12. COMPYPY

    COMPYPY Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Posts:
    80
    People have voted for avira f-secure whem there are so many laggerds option available :eek:
     
  13. sm1

    sm1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    520
    I feel Norton 2006 is the heaviest. But now I am using 2012 which is light:)
     
  14. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    8,029
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    I've used Bullguard, Norton & McAfee in the past. McAfee was the most bloaty I think, although Norton was the most problematical. I don't use suites now.
     
  15. codylucas16

    codylucas16 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Posts:
    267
    Kaspersky eats more CPU than anything else that I've tried in the past three years.
     
  16. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
    Coranti, G Data, old versions of Norton and F-Secure...

    Although I don't use AVs in real-time protection,
    I like to try them whenever a major version is released...:cool:
     
  17. guest

    guest Guest

    Norton 2002 was definitely the heavier (or so it felt).
     
  18. COMPYPY

    COMPYPY Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Posts:
    80
    really:eek:
     
  19. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,833
    The ones that come in a box from a store :D
     
  20. mack_guy911

    mack_guy911 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Posts:
    2,677

    :thumb:
     
  21. Judge Dee

    Judge Dee Guest

    Since the question asked "you ever used", it was Kaspersky in 2003. My sickly little computer barely moved. Went to Dr. Web and it acted young again. :)
    And although it was an AT, I must mention TDS-3. I got so excited reading about it, I installed a trial, but my computer would freeze while the voice was saying whatever it said. Boy was I depressed.
     
  22. Dundertaker

    Dundertaker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Posts:
    385
    Location:
    Land of the Mer Lion
    Used GData and BitDefender last 2009 for a shor while and it made my system crawl. Tried FSecure IS also a bit lighter than the two but system wasstill slow. Went back to Avast/Avira.
     
  23. ExtremeGamerBR

    ExtremeGamerBR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Posts:
    1,115
    BitDefender Total Security 2009. :(
     
  24. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    4,050
    Location:
    USA
    I would have to say Kaspersky after the .325 version 7 update and the 2009 version. I have tested Bitdefender versions that were worse but the poll did say "you ever used" and I did not actually "use" Bitdefender for more than the 5 minutes it took to discover it was unusable. Also Norton 2004 was pretty bad but I did not use it longer than the trial period.
     
  25. jadinolf

    jadinolf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Posts:
    466
    Location:
    Ojai, CA
    Norton was for me but the last version I used was 2005. I understand it is now much better.
     
Loading...