Which ESET-Homepage is definitely the actually ones ?

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by honeybunny, Mar 17, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. honeybunny

    honeybunny Suspended Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Posts:
    168
    May I have an official info from ESET Mods, which of all ESET-Homepages is the actually one ? Sometime it's the Slovakian, another the US, another time Switzerland. So, which is allways the actualliest one ?

    But, it's fact, not the german one :mad:
     
  2. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
  3. honeybunny

    honeybunny Suspended Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Posts:
    168
    Thanks a lot Marcos :D

    I wish, the german were so fast too.

    Enjoy your weekend :thumb:
     
  4. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,148
    Location:
    Denmark
    German one, where's that?
     
  5. honeybunny

    honeybunny Suspended Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Posts:
    168
    @Brian
    www.nod32.de

    Today's actual. Since an few hours. :D
     
  6. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,148
    Location:
    Denmark
    Ah ok :)
     
  7. Shaker

    Shaker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Posts:
    153
    Location:
    Norther California

    Too bad the eset.com page doesn't look like the eset.sk page. The eset.sk page is much better looking. :)
     
  8. honeybunny

    honeybunny Suspended Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Posts:
    168
    Maybe you're right. But both of them are looking better than the german one :rolleyes:
     
  9. CyGho

    CyGho Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Posts:
    35
    Location:
    The Netherlands
  10. honeybunny

    honeybunny Suspended Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Posts:
    168
    Yep, and today the german still shows 1.1456 :eek:
     
  11. Happy Bytes

    Happy Bytes Guest

    But they translated lots of my descriptions into german :D
     
  12. Joliet Jake

    Joliet Jake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Posts:
    911
    Location:
    Scotland
  13. Benvan45

    Benvan45 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Posts:
    556
    Yes, Dutch, but way behind, just look at the downloads. Also, support is bad, very bad! That's my experience, mailed several times, never got an answer.
    Being a little ashamed being Dutch..........Eset should perk them up a bit!
     
  14. mrtwolman

    mrtwolman Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Posts:
    613
    eset.co.uk does not belong to ESET.
     
  15. doctor IT

    doctor IT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Posts:
    30
    http://www.eset.sk/en :p
     
  16. Shaker

    Shaker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Posts:
    153
    Location:
    Norther California
  17. whistl3r

    whistl3r Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Posts:
    69

    Not too much to worry about... This Campbell guy has had hit for over a year and yet no content. Besides, if it's to impersonate eset.com the Policia would be on his front door ;)

    Code:
        Domain name:
            eset.co.uk
    
        Registrant:
            Mark Campbell
    
        Registrant type:
            UK Individual
    
        Administrative contact's address:
            No address listed.
    
        Registrant's agent:
            Fibranet Services Ltd [Tag = FIBRANET]
    
        Relevant dates:
            Registered on: 08-Jun-2000
            Renewal date:  08-Jun-2006
            Last updated:  01-Aug-2005
    
        Registration status:
            Registered until renewal date.
    
        Name servers:
            ns1.ukdnsservers.co.uk
            ns2.ukdnsservers.co.uk
     
  18. honeybunny

    honeybunny Suspended Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Posts:
    168
    Any differencies between Sign.Update Nr. 1.1464 und 1.14.65 ? Or is it just because of the at first pushed out wrong date sounds 11.01.2006 ? :eek:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.