When do you think the new version will be released?

Discussion in 'ProcessGuard' started by Learner, Jun 6, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Learner

    Learner Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Posts:
    16
    Also, Yahoo and probably simular programs I've seen that users work around to access systems, how is this possible, with ProcessGuard in place?
     
  2. Paranoid2000

    Paranoid2000 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2004
    Posts:
    2,839
    Location:
    North West, United Kingdom
    For the latest details on the next release, see the ProcessGuard v3.3b4 (final) ready thread. Given that people have reported a few issues with it, it is to be expected that the next update will take some time.

    As for Yahoo, please provide exact details of your problem. PG is not a web filter so should have no impact on the Yahoo website - if however you are referring to Yahoo software installed on your system, then check the Protection settings for it. PG's Learning Mode will create permissions allowing everything that happens (which is why DiamondCS recommend installing PG on a clean system) so any cases where PG appears to be "failing" will almost surely be due to overly-generous permissions created by Learning Mode, which you can then tighten or remove.
     
  3. Gavin - DiamondCS

    Gavin - DiamondCS Former DCS Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2002
    Posts:
    2,080
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    I'll be doing final testing of PG 3.400 this week. Unfortunately PG helped find a severe problem with other software. This caused the loss of a drives partitions and put me back a couple of days restoring data.

    Apparently, OUR problem is completely fixed. I'll be testing for at least a couple of days this time. You should hear more by early next week :)
     
  4. G1111

    G1111 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Posts:
    2,127
    Location:
    USA
    Gavin - Thanks for the update.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.