What's the best between NPF 2004 and ZAP?

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by c0ltran3, May 17, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. c0ltran3

    c0ltran3 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Posts:
    172
    I'm sorry but I'm goig to put a comparison between NPF 2004 and ZAP.
    Thanks for your answers.
     
  2. Paranoid2000

    Paranoid2000 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2004
    Posts:
    2,839
    Location:
    North West, United Kingdom
    Are you asking others to make a comparison? If so, I would make the following points:
    • Norton is a rules-based firewall which allows you to set more specific controls on applications than ZoneAlarm - however this is only going to be useful for advanced users who are prepared to take the time to find out what access each application needs;
    • Symantec have added Product Activation to all their products - this in my view raises concerns about whether the product may "deactivate" itself (or be deactivated by any malware) leaving you with a crippled product as well as the possibility that Symantec can force you to upgrade by withdrawing activation keys for the current version.
    In my view, Symantec should be avoided simply due to the Product Activation. ZoneAlarm is an easier choice for the novice, but if you want a rules-based firewall then check out Kerio or Outpost.
     
  3. c0ltran3

    c0ltran3 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Posts:
    172
    Paranoid2000
    thanks for your answer.
     
  4. charlesvar

    charlesvar Guest

    As of ZAP 4.x, has rulemaking.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.