What's d differences of old & new Dirms defragger

I am just wonderin, what really are the differences of the older free versions of Dirms from it new paid version version..especially the command line defragger...?

Coz as of now, I'm back using the old free version of command line Dirms. As I think its size is very small compared to others and I think it is also a purebred defragger...and I also don't like the idea of somethin running in the background connected to the defragger function as I only defrags manually.

HHmmmn...and for color...I just change its cmd screen into another color as when it starts to defrag than the usual boring black and white screen. As of now it looks like candy already...

Still, I am wonderin if there's really a big technical input to their newer version...

 

i dont get what people dont like about background service defragging.
diskeeper 2007 pro uses a background service but it never slows me down but defrags all the time so i dont have to do it manually.
lodore

 

Just because is not necessary...

 

its easier thou and i dont ever have to remember to do it.
pc always running the best it can well at least when i get my new ram
lodore

 

Hhhhmmmnn....maybe, they just don't know the answer.. ..that's why they go with to other topic..

 

i found this thread in their forum: What's the diff?

and the answer: