What Microsoft OS did u start with?

Discussion in 'polls' started by nadirah, Jun 20, 2004.

?

What Microsoft OS did you start with?

Poll closed Aug 19, 2004.
  1. Windows 1.0 and MS-DOS

    31.8%
  2. Windows 2.0

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Windows 3.0

    16.7%
  4. Windows 3.1/3.11 for Workgroups

    16.7%
  5. Windows NT 3.1

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Windows 95

    13.6%
  7. Windows NT 4.0

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. Windows 98 and Windows 98 SE

    13.6%
  9. Windows 2000

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. Windows XP home edition and professional

    7.6%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nadirah

    nadirah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    3,647
    What Operating System did u first start with?
     
  2. MikeBCda

    MikeBCda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Posts:
    1,627
    Location:
    southern Ont. Canada
    With all due respect, the choices weren't that great -- they almost take for granted you started under one version or another of Windows.

    My first home PC was under DOS 3-something, eventually upgraded as far as 6.2 -- I'd heard what a disaster DOS 4 was and bypassed that entirely, and for my money DOS 5 added (and improved) more useful features and utilities than any other DOS version, with 3.3 a close second.

    Windows (my first was 3.1) only came along later, as it was the only reasonable way to get internet access. Went from 3.1 to 98SE to my current XP-Home in the process of replacing computers over the years.

    At work, we pre-dated even MS, started out under CP/M (which Gates liked enough to copy huge chunks of into the earliest DOS versions). Went through the same DOS 3-to-5-to-6 progression there, and at the time I retired about 9 years ago were running mostly 6.0, with Win 3.11 under it for the odd program that needed it.
     
  3. snowbound

    snowbound Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Posts:
    8,723
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    The one i still use, XP Home. ;) :D


    snowbound
     
  4. chiphead

    chiphead Guest

    I think i started on the Vic 20. Does that count as an OS?
     
  5. MikeBCda

    MikeBCda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Posts:
    1,627
    Location:
    southern Ont. Canada
    Hi chiphead, and welcome. :)

    You're right, I was thinking in terms of what we now think of as PC's. But before my first 386/40 (and before the office machine) I had a C64 myself (and loved it), and that and its Vic predecessor were both definitely honest-to-? programmable computers with OS's, as compared to the dedicated games machines we probably both also had.
     
  6. slammer_JvA

    slammer_JvA Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Posts:
    1,588
    Location:
    Below sea-level. Safe and sound behind our dikes:
    ah..the C64! Now doesn't that bring back very charming memories!
    How long has that been now..."only" 20 years or so: man, have we rocketed since then :)
     
  7. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,873
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    A tandy 1000, and them a tandy 1500 laptop. ;) == Dos.
     
  8. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,785
    Location:
    Texas
    Windows 3.1 sitting on top of Dos 6. Learned a lot of Dos in those days. :)
     
  9. Mr.Blaze

    Mr.Blaze The Newbie Welcome Wagon

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Posts:
    2,842
    Location:
    on the sofa
    where the heck is windows me i never even heard of the other 2 lol
     
  10. Mr.Blaze

    Mr.Blaze The Newbie Welcome Wagon

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Posts:
    2,842
    Location:
    on the sofa
    :eek: correction other 4 omg how old are you guys

    some of that stuff was back when bill gates was still getting beat up and put in the garbage can whoaaaaaaaaaa
     
  11. Tassie_Devils

    Tassie_Devils Global Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2002
    Posts:
    2,514
    Location:
    State Queensland, Australia
    Started at work first, our first *PC type* was like a small little box with a RED LED SINGLE LINE TYPE READOUT. [Can you imagine the eye strain after 6-7 hours on that crap. :doubt:

    You typed and only saw what was being typed on the current line, it 'transferred' to a ticker-tape/stockmarket-type paper punchout and that was fed into another monster of a machine which printed out on a filmy-type paper which was waxed and pasted into strips/sections into layouts. [Newspaper]

    After many variations of that theme, work eventually progressed into:

    Windows 3.1...> 98SE...> W2K....> XP PRO and LOTS of MAC's OS10x in Editorial, Scanning Department. Some PC's still run under 98SE and only new ones are installed with XP PRO.

    Personal home was Windows 95b had that for 5 years.
    Straight to W2K PRO skipped all the dramas of 98 98SE 98ME.

    Then around 2 years ago got XP PRO. and LOVE it.

    @ Blaze.. yep, guess we are *OLD* :p

    TAS
     
  12. greyfox

    greyfox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Posts:
    577
    Location:
    Washington State USA
    Our first computer was a 386 with Windows 3.0. I can't remember what the DOS version was on that computer. I upgraded that computer to Windows 3.1 and then we bought a new computer with 98SE, which I'm still using.
     
  13. MikeBCda

    MikeBCda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Posts:
    1,627
    Location:
    southern Ont. Canada
    There are nasty rumors that I was toilet-training little Noah and teaching him to walk and talk ages before he got "drafted" into building the Ark. ;)

    Seriously though -- and I can't remember whether this is also in my profile -- I'm late 50's, less than a year and a half shy of 60.

    Only slightly O/T, since this concerns a language rather than an OS, Tassie's last post reminded me of a programming course I took when I was hoping to get accounting certification as an RIA. We played with Fortran -- wrote the coding then handed the resulting tons of paper to a guy who did the card-punching.

    What was interesting was, we were told that what we were learning was at that time (mid or late '70's?) considered "the" definitive version of Fortran, Wat-For, developed right here at the U. of Waterloo (I lived in Toronto at the time, moved here a few years later when my company did).
     
  14. meneer

    meneer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Posts:
    1,132
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    My first Microsoft experience was MS-Dos without directorystructure. It was just a DOS, running on a non-IBM compatible PC. The floppy disks (real floppy) contained not 360 Kb, but 800 Kb.
    And there was Mbasic. Coming from a Sinclair ZX81 and Spectrum, I really disliked that basic version.

    Windows? Not until version 3, this was only usefull because of Visual Basic 1.0.
     
  15. cl0ck

    cl0ck Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Posts:
    50
    Location:
    Southeast Asia
    my first OS is Windows 3.1 for home use
    would u believe that my parents still keep that comp in the house until now?
     
  16. Pieter_Arntz

    Pieter_Arntz Spyware Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Posts:
    13,332
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Memory lane. C64. I typed programs from magazines into that thing in machinecode. Very funny if you made a mistake somewhere. :D

    First Windows version was 95 (I had a Sega Gameconsole after the C64).

    Regards,

    Pieter
     
  17. MikeBCda

    MikeBCda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Posts:
    1,627
    Location:
    southern Ont. Canada
    Way to go, Pieter. :) I was never that ambitious (or daring), the only "keyboarding" I got from books and magazines was in basic. Mostly I stuck to ready-to-run stuff on diskettes, and the odd one on cartridge.

    One thing about the C64, anybody who used it (and did more than just run store-bought games) eventually got good at memorizing peeks and pokes, because so many of its memory locations were dedicated to one function or another.
     
  18. Bubba

    Bubba Updates Team

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    11,271
    You were one of them rich nerds....all we could afford was the Vic 20....but my kids thought I was smart when I made a bouncing ball :)
     
  19. dak

    dak Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Posts:
    52
    I think I predate you by a little...I started on a TRS-80, 4K, Level I. Later upgraded it myself to a 16K, Level II with numeric keypad. Even built a little "load monitor" that sat between the tape drive (okay, so it was just a tape recorder/player) and the computer, so that I could monitor the tape load volume on a meter. That stopped a lot of the load errors by being too soft or too loud (which you never found out about until after the entire tape loaded and then didn't run).

    When I moved to the Commodore systems I was amazed they could get color, sound and animation out of only three registers (I think it was three; A, X & Y), when my beloved "Trash-80" was only black&white with very primitive animation and almost non-existent sound, but had thirty-two registers (16 current and 16 alternate that could be swapped in and out)! Never had a 64, but I did have a Vic-20 and a C-128D (still do, but gave the TRS-80 to a computer museum). Ran all the available O/Ses on the 128D, BASIC, CP/M, GEOS (the Commodore version of Windows). First went online with the 128D, Comp-U-Seve, Prodigy, Q-Link, AOL, and even ran a couple of C= BBSes.

    After moving to IBM compatible machines I stuck with DOS for a long time, didn't bother with Windows, I didn't need it. Ran a few more BBSes, even joined FidoNet networking member BBSes, all DOS based.
    I think 3.0 was the first version of Windows I ever loaded, but 3.1 was the first I actually used. I ran WFW3.11 until about 3 or 4 years ago, and then jumped from it straight to WIN98SE, where I still am.

    Geez, I got kinda long-winded there reminiscing....

    --
    dak
     
  20. LowWaterMark

    LowWaterMark Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Posts:
    17,877
    Location:
    New England
    I've put this thread back together and removed the posts that went badly off track. I am declaring a do over, so don't bring any of those posts or arguments back to this thread. Thanks.
     
  21. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,873
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma

    Just thinking back to the old computers does bring back memories. The tandy 1500 had a color screen and pretty fair graphics. By the way I still have both of those computers and they still work just like they were new. Really amazes me. :)
     
  22. LowWaterMark

    LowWaterMark Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Posts:
    17,877
    Location:
    New England
    Though I've been in computing for a long time, I didn't have or use PCs until late in the time frame when Windows 3.1 and Windows for Workgroups (3.11) were the current popular OS.

    The first computer I owned was a TRS-80 (16K - Level II), but I had used Minis and Mainframes before that. Later, I moved on to the first Mac, (well actually the second - 512K system) which was quite nice for awhile, (actually I still have it and it still powers up), though that screen was mighty small! In the work world, I was always running data center based systems, accessed via remote terminals. Working long hours on computers at work I had basically got my fill of computing, so I didn't get a PC at home for a very long time. My first PC was running Windows for Workgroups (3.11). After that system died, I got a nice Windows 95 Pentium Pro system that I used up until just a little over two years ago when I got my current XP Home system.
     
  23. Pilli

    Pilli Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    6,217
    Location:
    Hampshire UK
    My first computer was a BBC 64k, 32K for the OS and a big 32K for programmes which you could upload / download to a portable cassette recorder, patience was definately a virtue! The screen was your TV and in colur of sorts. I remeber that lovely blocky text :eek:
    I learned enough BBC basic to produce a programme for working out the components necessary to produce specific cross-over frequencies in loudspeaker systems.
    After feeding the programme certain basic parameters such as speaker impedence, required X-over frequecies and whether it was 1st, 2nd or third order the programme would give me the required inductance, capacitance & resistors to meet the criteria. And it worked! :D
    First IBM compatable was running DOS 3 - and I have moved through all MS os's since apart from NT though I did rather like IBM's OS2 for a while :cool:
     
  24. DMo224

    DMo224 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Posts:
    81
    Location:
    Almost Heaven, USA
    Windows 3.0

    I'm not going to take the walk down memory lane on how I worked off two floppy drives with one running the program and the other saving the work. I'm not 'membering Tandy neither! :p
     
  25. Azn_Tweaker

    Azn_Tweaker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2004
    Posts:
    120
    Location:
    Canada, Toronto
    i started with Windows XP Pro
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.