Watch remote hackers easily take control of this Jeep and more

Discussion in 'other security issues & news' started by ronjor, Jul 21, 2015.

  1. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.geekwire.com/2015/watch-remote-hackers-easily-take-control-of-this-jeep/
     
  2. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.wired.com/2015/07/senate-bill-seeks-standards-cars-defenses-hackers/
     
  3. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    As the owner of a late model Chrysler vehicle I am greatly concerned about some of the technology used. The keyless systems are nice, but I suspect some day someone will just walk up and drive away with my car. :(
     
  4. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

  5. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

  6. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.securityweek.com/feedback-friday-industry-reactions-remote-car-hacking
     
  7. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.cso.com.au/article/58066...-safety-security-threats-from-connected-cars/
     
  8. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

  9. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.wired.com/2015/07/patch-gm-onstar-ios-app-avoid-wireless-car-hack/
     
  10. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.scmagazine.com/no-other-vehicles-with-vulnerable-system/article/430363/
     
  11. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

  12. Amanda

    Amanda Registered Member

    I'm guessing that if it's easy to crack'em it's also easy to secure them?
     
  13. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Not sure how easy it is but it is fixed in Tesla's case.
     
  14. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.networkworld.com/article...ts-os-was-to-blame-in-jeep-cherokee-hack.html
     
  15. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.wired.com/2015/08/hackers-cut-corvettes-brakes-via-common-car-gadget/
     
  16. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

  17. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

  18. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Since it concerns a lot more brands, I think it would be a good idea to rename this thread.

    From the paper mentioned in the article ronjor just posted:

    So much fail...
    https://www.usenix.org/sites/default/files/sec15_supplement.pdf
     
  19. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=18784
     
  20. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

  21. Kobayashi maru

    Kobayashi maru Registered Member

    How about: Get an autonomous vehicle and you may be in it while it takes you for the ride of your life as well. Or the roadtrains comprised of all manner of vehicles controlled by the front one, being a source of much pain and agony for many.

    Won't happen? History suggests the possibility exists, and as is usual with technology these days, it seems these bridges will be crossed when they are arrived at. However, sadly, the lesson will be learnt too late, even though the future can be pretty much summed up already.
     
  22. Keatah

    Keatah Registered Member

    Why do a car's vital systems need to made vulnerable and available to outside hacking all of a sudden? Didn't they work fine for the past 100 years?
     
  23. Kobayashi maru

    Kobayashi maru Registered Member

    Convenience is a powerful selling tool when you're dealing with the lazy, or those who don't understand the implications these 'helpful' features provide. Do we really need cars that self park, when this what a licenced person should be able to do as part of the qualified driver deal?
     
  24. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    http://www.securityweek.com/car-hacker-charlie-miller-leaves-twitter
     
  25. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice