W2K or TinyXP Rev09 ?

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by trdr, Jun 3, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trdr

    trdr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Posts:
    32
    on my Celeron 500, 300+ ram I'm using W2K, just discovered Tiny and
    wondering if it's worth installing instead of W2K — opinions ?

    if you're using Tiny, which Option - 1-9 did you install and why ?
     
  2. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    TinyXP is warez FYI. And besides you can create your own tiny XP with nLite.

    For your computer I would use Windows 2000 or even liter: an nLited Windows 2000 :D
     
  3. farmerlee

    farmerlee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,585
    yeh strip down win2000 and it will run lightning fast on your system..
     
  4. jrmhng

    jrmhng Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2007
    Posts:
    1,268
    Location:
    Australia
    Or a light version of Linux...
     
  5. Kerodo

    Kerodo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Posts:
    7,786
    There is no comparison between 2k and Xp on an older machine, stick with Win2k, it's much faster and lighter overall....
     
  6. trdr

    trdr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Posts:
    32
    I hadn't thought of Tiny in terms of warez, just that it was supposed
    to be a 'fast version' of XP and that it was an 'auto' install

    I know of nLite but not sure I have the technical skills I think may be
    needed to 'liten' W2K


    thanks for the replies
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.