W2K or TinyXP Rev09 ?

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by trdr, Jun 3, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trdr

    trdr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Posts:
    32
    on my Celeron 500, 300+ ram I'm using W2K, just discovered Tiny and
    wondering if it's worth installing instead of W2K — opinions ?

    if you're using Tiny, which Option - 1-9 did you install and why ?
     
  2. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    TinyXP is warez FYI. And besides you can create your own tiny XP with nLite.

    For your computer I would use Windows 2000 or even liter: an nLited Windows 2000 :D
     
  3. farmerlee

    farmerlee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,585
    yeh strip down win2000 and it will run lightning fast on your system..
     
  4. jrmhng

    jrmhng Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2007
    Posts:
    1,268
    Location:
    Australia
    Or a light version of Linux...
     
  5. Kerodo

    Kerodo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Posts:
    7,915
    There is no comparison between 2k and Xp on an older machine, stick with Win2k, it's much faster and lighter overall....
     
  6. trdr

    trdr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Posts:
    32
    I hadn't thought of Tiny in terms of warez, just that it was supposed
    to be a 'fast version' of XP and that it was an 'auto' install

    I know of nLite but not sure I have the technical skills I think may be
    needed to 'liten' W2K


    thanks for the replies
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.