VB RAP Test Averages Quadrant August 2010 - February 2011

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by atomomega, Feb 18, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. atomomega

    atomomega Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Posts:
    1,285
    http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/rap-index.xml
     
  2. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    786
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    thx for update

    cant find norton ??
     
  3. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,558
    Symantic is near the middle. I can't find Panda.
     
  4. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    786
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    thx , got it ... surprising results
     
  5. stratoc

    stratoc Guest

    Everyone keeps saying eset are doing poorly in tests,I think they're doing great, when you concider some of the massive multi engine resource zapping bloat donkies they're nearly as good as..
     
  6. Boyfriend

    Boyfriend Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Posts:
    1,070
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Thanks for update :thumb:

    Panda is not included??
     
  7. dr pan k

    dr pan k Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Posts:
    204
    it would be interesting to have 2 separate quadrants for single and multi-engine AVs.
     
  8. dr pan k

    dr pan k Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Posts:
    204
    and a second thingy i had in mind: some ppl bashing eset every time some rigged test pops up never comment when most respected test org place eset among top....:shifty:

    (not that i personally trust even 1 testing org but its part of the game)
     
  9. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,558
    I agree. I actually think Norton is possibly the best AV out there currently.
     
  10. sm1

    sm1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    520
    Thanks for the info:) Are the products allowed to connect to their online database and use features like HIPS during testing? My guess is the products are tested with only offline signature database.
     
  11. fasteddy2020

    fasteddy2020 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Posts:
    106
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks stratoc, this made me me laugh out loud.
     
  12. zerotox

    zerotox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Posts:
    417
    Well, if you look at the previous RAP test results, Norton has never been above the middle. Bear in mind that these RAP tests are based on on-demand scan and detection results, where Norton rarely shines - see the AV comparatives on demand retrospective results - middle again most of the time. SONAR is not tested here, that's why the results. Do not confuse dynamic tests with VB RAP tests.
     
  13. Someheresomethere

    Someheresomethere Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Posts:
    71
    Is it Norton or Endpoint Security? 'Cause the latter's detection is not as good as the former's.
     
  14. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,558

    Good point, but it makes this test kind of worthless. At the very least you need to take these results with a gain of salt.
     
  15. zerotox

    zerotox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Posts:
    417
    I don't think it's worthless - it's exactly what it is - checking detection of the pure AV capabilities of the products - their heuristics and generic detections, no SONARS, HIPS or Behaviour blockers.
     
  16. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,558

    Right, because I often like to disable all the newer features of my AV programs.
     
  17. zerotox

    zerotox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Posts:
    417
    Of course not, don't get me wrong but that test does not claim anything more than what it really is and as such it is really good and according to my observations on the AVs I've used and tested on my PC it's correct. Nowhere does it say that it's a thorough protection test and I really don't know why should you criticize it on grounds it does not pretend to cover?
     
  18. andyman35

    andyman35 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    2,336
    Perhaps not entirely worthless,but misleading in regards to the overall protection offered by the various products.
     
  19. zerotox

    zerotox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Posts:
    417
    Well, to tell the truth there are many misleading tests in one way or another out there and every vendor takes the ones which speak of him best. Not to mention that many of the ads on the websites of the vendors are pure (misleading) marketing. But who is going to say on their site - well buy our product but you know, you can't trust it 100% as no AV is perfect. Well that'll be a marketing suicide in a way.
     
  20. andyman35

    andyman35 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    2,336
    Yes that's quite true.

    Unfortunately while people who frequent forums like this can take these tests in context,in the wider world where users tend to base everything on detection numbers,it's easy to manipulate results to suit.
     
  21. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,558
    :thumb:
     
  22. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,619
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Not a bad scorer for Vipre . At least they participated.:p
     
  23. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,558

    Vipre has always tested well for me. I think their signatures and IP filter are outstanding.
     
  24. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,468
    Nice!
    Results are kinda as always, EAM used to be at the top seems like not this time :D
     
  25. pbust

    pbust AV Expert

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    Posts:
    1,173
    Location:
    Spain
    The reason is that this test is done without Internet-connectivity, so no connection to cloud-based scanning is allowed.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.