VB 100--#30. Congrats!

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by JimIT, Feb 2, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JimIT

    JimIT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,035
    Location:
    Denton, Texas
    :D ...!
     
    JimIT, Feb 2, 2005
    #1
  2. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    163,838
    Location:
    Texas
    Excellent Eset!! [​IMG]
     
    ronjor, Feb 2, 2005
    #2
  3. visiting

    visiting Guest

    Why did they test with NOD version 1.529. Clicking the link on NOD's website and then clicking the "here" link displays the pdf.
     
    visiting, Feb 2, 2005
    #3
  4. mrtwolman

    mrtwolman Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Posts:
    613
    I would answer with usual RTFM, but to clear the 'lil issue - reprint demonstrates NOD32's performance in 2003-2004 tests. That's why there are versions 1.529 and 1.595 listed and not nowadays actual 1.990

    Best regards
     
    mrtwolman, Feb 3, 2005
    #4
  5. visiting

    visiting Guest

    I seem to have confused that with the actual PRODUCT VERSION # of NOD.....which is version 2.12.3

    The version # referenced in the article is referencing the Virus Signature Database Updates version......

    Thanks for clarifying.
     
    visiting, Feb 3, 2005
    #5
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...