Unbelieveable Scanning Time

Discussion in 'ESET Smart Security v3 Beta Forum' started by Steel, Aug 29, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Steel

    Steel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Posts:
    219
    Maybe I'm wrong, but could it be, that the newest AV-Version 3 Beta needs much more time for the Scanning ?:eek:

    OK, I enable all Options, like in depth scanning, but i cannot believe, that 2.70.39 was much more faster in that kind of scanning. What is the reason for that, only the fact that it's still on beta stage ? o_O
     
  2. The_Duality

    The_Duality Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Posts:
    276
    Location:
    Liverpool, UK
    I see the same here. Almost twice the time with the same settings as in 2.7... :doubt:
     
  3. proactivelover

    proactivelover Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Posts:
    840
    Location:
    Near Wilders Forums
    i think they support much archives in beta
    see how much scan files in nod32 2.7 and nod32 v3 beta
     
  4. The_Duality

    The_Duality Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Posts:
    276
    Location:
    Liverpool, UK
    Actually that may well be the cause. NOD never had much unpacker support, but i guess they must have improved it. :thumb:
     
  5. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    The scan speed of both ESS and EA here is equal to NOD32 v2.7's . I expected v3 to be faster but it isn't . To me it doesn't matter as long as it is the same . Perhaps it is (in)compatibility issue.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 29, 2007
  6. The_Duality

    The_Duality Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Posts:
    276
    Location:
    Liverpool, UK
    Perhaps, but has the engine changed that much? 2.7 works really well on my system. o_O
     
  7. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    Maybe you could check what folder / files ESS takes considerably more time to scan than v2. If you narrow it down to a particular file/folder you might want to zip it and send it to me for perusal. Let me know if you manage to figure that out.
     
  8. The_Duality

    The_Duality Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Posts:
    276
    Location:
    Liverpool, UK
    Okay ill try and figure that out. Thats going to take me a while though :p
     
  9. Steel

    Steel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Posts:
    219
    So, can you at this points say anything about, should the V. 3 Beta with the same settings ( Deep Scan ) as the 2.70.39 faster ?

    I check my settings again and the result ist, with the same settings ( all Scan Options are enabled ) the 2.70.39 is much more faster than the V. 3 Beta.

    Should the V. 3 Beta actually be faster than the 2.70.39 ? Or is the new version much more thorough and because of this fact clearly more slowly ? o_O

    I do not understand the fundamental point. Perhaps, because for no improvements or changes are given to the public.
     
  10. stueycaster

    stueycaster Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Posts:
    293
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    ESS seems about the same to me. I'm really happy with this app. From here it is bound to improve. :thumb:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.