I casually read this post: https://malwaretips.com/threads/google%E2%80%99s-manifest-v3-still-hurts-privacy-security-and-innovation.111481/#post-971368 If we take into account only the anti-trackers lists we need to consider the members of both forums that do not use Adguard DNS + Chrome-based browsers. In this case the greatest danger is CNAME-cloaked tracking. https://github.com/AdguardTeam/cname-trackers Any member who would like to do a test will notice that the AG- CNAME Disguised list to Chrome-based browsers: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdguardTeam/cname-trackers/master/combined_disguised_trackers.txt blocks more CNAME trackers than the default AG list in UBO. Is it better to use a list that blocks multiple CNAME trackers? Everyone must give himself the answer that he prefers. At this point I have to consider the anti-trackers protection (NOT CNAME) of my browser. If I trust this protection I can also choose an EasyPrivacy list. If I trust it a lot I can also choose an optimized EasyPrivacy list. The EasyPrivacy list with the lowest total number of rules is the "minified" list.