Tutorial for NOD32 v3 ???

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus' started by piranha, Dec 30, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. piranha

    piranha Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    623
    Location:
    Laval, Qu?bec, Canada
  2. Hiker

    Hiker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Posts:
    268
  3. piranha

    piranha Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    623
    Location:
    Laval, Qu?bec, Canada
    it is already installed, just want information about better settings then default
     
  4. Hiker

    Hiker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Posts:
    268
    Oh OK. Other than the help section I don't know of any. :oops:
     
  5. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    What makes you think default settings are not "the better one" ?
     
  6. piranha

    piranha Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    623
    Location:
    Laval, Qu?bec, Canada
    default setting = basic protection

    it could be better and we can set other way. I tried but v3 have a bigger footprint than v2.7..... But for my P3 733, 512 ram, default settings seems better :(
     
  7. wat0114

    wat0114 Guest

    You should stick with 2.7 until you get a beefed up machine.
     
  8. Bubba

    Bubba Updates Team

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    11,271
    Similar comments using various words have cropped up since this release but so far none have mentioned which settings that are not part of the default\Typical(recommended best settings) they feel need adjustment. Other than a user needing to choose during installation whether to enable\disable potentially unwanted applications, the settings are about as strong as one could tweak them IMMHO.

    Is your "basic protection" word usage and\or understanding based on word of mouth or do you have certain aspects of the install that you would further like to see tweaked in regards to protection ?

    Bubba
     
  9. piranha

    piranha Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    623
    Location:
    Laval, Qu?bec, Canada
    I choose NOD32 for the best protection AND its little footprint because of my old pc. Version 3 works fine, just looking for the best setting my pc could handle... and that need some test of different settings ;)


    Sorry, english is not my first language.....

    yes .....word of mouth as you said. Basic protection dont means it is not good, we can increase protection by custom settings

    heu...... what means IMMHO ?
     
  10. snowbound

    snowbound Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Posts:
    8,723
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    IMMHO=In My Most Humble Opinion



    snowbound
     
  11. piranha

    piranha Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    623
    Location:
    Laval, Qu?bec, Canada
    :thumb: :D
     
  12. Sir George

    Sir George Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Posts:
    32
    Totally ridiculous advice. The machine specs stated are easily sufficient to run version 2.x or version 3.x. I use some systems with less horsepower and there is no problem with any of them.

    It benefits no one to post information that is inaccurate and misleading.
     
  13. piranha

    piranha Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    623
    Location:
    Laval, Qu?bec, Canada
    I use default settings with minor customisation and nod32 run well and my old pc too ;)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.