trojan-backdoor-zubox_1 - Real Trojan??

Discussion in 'malware problems & news' started by B-2-0, Aug 8, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. B-2-0

    B-2-0 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    Posts:
    10
    Hi all.

    I have just installed Spy Sweeper on my machine and on the first scan it has detected what it believes to be a backdoor called....

    trojan-backdoor-zubox_1

    I first came here and ran a search but couldn't find a thing.

    I ran a Goooogle on it and came up with THIS

    I am running an ATI card with catalyst drivers so there is obviously a pattern here but it would be nice if one of you more experienced guys or gals could look into and confirm this please.

    *Edit* Both NOD32 and HJT don't pick anything up regarding this.

    Any help is greatly appreciated,

    B
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2005
  2. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    I don't know because i have ATi with catalyst too and Spy Sweeper doesn't find it here (Using Spyware Definitions 511), maybe you should report it via "report spyware" in options?
     
  3. Tom772

    Tom772 Guest

    Hey, this seems to be a False Postive simialar to the one MSAS(except thay call it Trojan 93!!) is giving, pls see this link at castlecops>

    http://castlecops.com/p600694-SpySw...or_zubox_1.html
     
  4. B-2-0

    B-2-0 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    Posts:
    10
    Thanx for your replies folks.

    Tom, i also found that post but i'm still a little unsure as there is very little info on this around.

    Any suggestions on what i should do? Should i just ignore it for now and see if updates sort it out?
     
  5. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    B-2-0

    Why don't you just report it, all the threads are asking more or less the same thing, are this a PF? It would end the speculation. :)
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.