Time to copy a Snapshot

Discussion in 'FirstDefense-ISR Forum' started by Antarctica, Aug 20, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    1,617
    Location:
    Canada
    I just want to know if it is normal that it took 1h 38 min. to copy a snapshot of 5.40Gb to a external USB Harddriveo_O

    Thanks
     
  2. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    1h38m is way too slow, even absurd.
    Can't you give more details of the hardware ?
     
  3. wilbertnl

    wilbertnl Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2004
    Posts:
    1,850
    Location:
    Tulsa, Oklahoma
    Are you using a USB 1.1 or USB 2.0 connection?
     
  4. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    17,040
    It wasn't USB 1.1 by chance. That might account for it.

    Pete
     
  5. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    1,617
    Location:
    Canada
    Well, I know my PC is not of the last generation...

    It's a AMD 1800+1.56 GHz and with 512 Meg of Ram.

    Peter2150, yes I am still using USB 1.1.:oops:
     
  6. ESQ_ERRANT

    ESQ_ERRANT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Posts:
    72
    As a possible point of reference, it takes FD, as it is installed on my machine, about 1.4 hours to copy a 14+ Gigabyte snapshot to my internal hard drive. This is roughly three times the size of your snapshot. As a matter of fact I just made a snapshot today.

    My system is several years old, too. I have a Pentium 4 processor, 2.05 megahertz, and 512 megabytes of ram. This may or may not be within the generally acceptable range for FD. I don't know. But, for what it's worth, I give you these stats.
     
  7. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    Now I understand why it's so slow. No further comments, because I don't want to hurt your feelings. :)
     
  8. wilbertnl

    wilbertnl Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2004
    Posts:
    1,850
    Location:
    Tulsa, Oklahoma
    If you have USB 1.1, then it's faster to transfer huge data over wired lan. In case that is an option, of course.
     
  9. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    1,617
    Location:
    Canada

    Thanks to everyone for your comments:)

    I am planning to get a new system at the end of the year or next year. So in the mean time I can live with this slow speed problem, I'm not exporting or importing snapshot every day.:p
     
  10. q1aqza

    q1aqza Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Posts:
    312
    I'm no hardware expert but I think you can get USB2 PCI cards quite cheap. Might be a useful stop gap until the end of the year
     
  11. Acadia

    Acadia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Posts:
    4,048
    Location:
    SouthCentral PA
    Takes me 9-12 minutes to copy (totally create a new Snapshot) about 4.5-5.0 gig, but that is to another internal drive. :doubt:

    Acadia
     
  12. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,873
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    If you can disconnect from the internet and then turn off your av that should speed up the snapshot creation considerably. I am making snapshots of 19gb on this machine and with av on it takes about fourty minutes and with av off it takes about twenty five minutes. This is a very fast computer but it even makes a difference on this one. It's worth a try.
     
  13. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    17,040
    Good point. I always disable my AV when doing any copying with FDISR
     
  14. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    You understood me very well. That was exactly what I wanted to say. :D
    But waiting as long as possible to buy a new computer is also good.
    My new computer is already out-of-date, only the components are new.

    FYI, according my Seagate External Harddisk Manual, the theoretical speeds are :
    USB 1.1 = 12 Mbits/sec
    USB 2.0 = 480 Mbits/sec
    FireWire= 400 Mbits/sec

    As you can see there is a huge difference between USB 1.1 and USB 2.0 and is probably the main reason why it lasted 1h38m on your computer.
     
  15. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    1,617
    Location:
    Canada
    Thanks bigc73524 and all the others for your help and comment. I'll give it a try with disconnect the Internet and AV turn off.

    I will let you know.:)
     
  16. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    I do exactly the same thing as bigc, but there is a difference.
    1. BigC disconnect the internet and turns off AV.
    2. I boot to a snapshot that has no internet, no security softwares, no internet-related softwares, like email, browsers, etc.
    In that special snapshot, I create most of my snapshots.
     
  17. WWS

    WWS Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Posts:
    249
    It might be a good idea to make a note in the new snapshot description to remind you the AV is turned off!
     
  18. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    17,040
    Had an opportunity to do a timing. Times clearly depend on hardware. I created a new snapshot from an archive on a 2nd internal drive.

    Snapshot size was 9.5Gb. Time was 7 minutes with transfer rates up to 24580 KB/sec
     
  19. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    1,617
    Location:
    Canada
    My transfer rate was 1215 KB/sec.:oops: It's definitly time to change my system.:cool:
    It should be done in the next two month, hopefully.
     
  20. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    17,040
    I'll time it to USB later. Difference between new box and old box is unreal. Old box wasn't a slouch either.
     
  21. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    17,040
    Time to create and external snapshot on a USB 2.0 drive was 15:27 minutes. About twice the internal drive
     
  22. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    Creating archived snapshots on an external harddisk takes longer, but refreshing them is a matter of seconds or a few minutes.

    Frankly I'm not impressed by USB 2.0 at all, I thought it would work faster, but it doesn't bother me.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2006
  23. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    1,617
    Location:
    Canada
    O.K.I test it with my present system, disconnect Internet and turn off KIS and BoClean. It took 1h12 mn instead of 1h38 mn, so I would say about 20% speed increase.:p
     
  24. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    Well, 26 minutes less is quite an improvement considering the circumstances. Computers are really fast. Aren't they ? :rolleyes: :D
     
  25. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    1,617
    Location:
    Canada
    Hé ErikAlbert, 26 minutes gives me enough time to drink a beer.:p :D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.