Thunderbird 5

Discussion in 'ESET Smart Security' started by vigen, Jul 5, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. vigen

    vigen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Posts:
    60
    Hello,


    When are ready the Thunderbird module for ESS?

    Regards;

    Vigen.
     
  2. a3_alin

    a3_alin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Posts:
    59
    Location:
    Romania

    I wonder too...o_O
     
  3. vigen

    vigen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Posts:
    60
    Up !!!
     
  4. agoretsky

    agoretsky Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,032
    Location:
    California
    Hello,

    As mentioned here and here, support for Mozilla Thunderbird 5.0 is being implemented in ESET Smart Security v5.0.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky
     
  5. vigen

    vigen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Posts:
    60
    Ok;

    Thanks for your reply.
     
  6. falke69

    falke69 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Posts:
    45
    Mozilla has decreased time span between new versions.

    I assume that there will be Thunderbird 6 or 7 until ESS 5 will be ready.

    Or am I wrong ?
     
  7. mbmalone

    mbmalone Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2005
    Posts:
    13
    What's sad is that I know you are right.
    When Thunderbird 6 or 7 comes out, ESS 5 will finally work properly with Thunderbird 5 :thumbd:
     
  8. rcdailey

    rcdailey Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Posts:
    233
    I just got updated automatically from Thunderbird 5.0 to Thunderbird 6.0. Eset is still incompatible, of course. What I wonder is whether with ESS/NOD32 5, compatibility problems will be solved or will continue to plague users of Thunderbird?
     
  9. no_idea

    no_idea Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Posts:
    83
    completely off-topic rant

    The "plague" as you put it so quaintly is imho Thunderbird or Mozilla Corp for that matter.

    Come on: Major internal changes on a bimonthly basis?!? Where do they live? - Most certainly not in "corporate land". If they want to keep showering the world with alpha releases at that pace, well, carry on - it's filling the user's needs what made Firefox / Thunderbird major contenders.

    Now they seem to have abandoned their user base and prefer to play 'catch-up-with-Google' - well, good luck! Any company that feels they can ignore their clients (whether paying or not) better be prepared for bad news ...

    Oh yeah, getting rid of version numbers won't help the issue one bit - but it certainly shows how completely they lost their marbles ...

    My advice to ESET is: Get rid of the dedicated Thunderbird-plugin as soon as possible and concentrate your business efforts on stable products with a future.

    <end of rant>
     
  10. rcdailey

    rcdailey Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Posts:
    233
    Your rant is legitimate IMHO. Full integration of Eset and TBird with all these updates is probably just not going to happen, so get rid of that plug-in and have no real integration except maybe with the Microsoft products. Even that may not be so easy with Windows Live Mail. I have no idea what is going to become of TBird, but maybe I'll have to get a new computer and won't use TBird anymore.
     
  11. sangam

    sangam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Posts:
    49
    Location:
    ahmedabad, india
    sorry.... but antivirus without thunderbird plugin is unthinkable, atleast now with huge thunderbird users out there.
     
  12. Matt_au

    Matt_au Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Posts:
    8

    Lets see now.

    ESET refuses to use the standard add-on process Mozilla created. They role their own. A new version comes along and breaks it. Who exactly should have the job of fixing it?

    ESET uses Binary components in their Add-on. Mozilla specifically warns against this.

    Mozilla automatically bump compatibility of standard add-ons hosted on their servers. Eset don't use that.

    NOD32 is still doing it's job without the add-on in Thunderbird (yes that's right the add on is not required) So why create it in the first place? I can't get an answer to that question.

    The fast release cycle for Thunderbird is just a change to the version numbers. It may be nothing more than a very minor security and stability release that gets a new major number.

    In my opinion these add in bits of anti virus programs do not a single bit of good. They are marketing fluff, put an icon in the program to give a silly sense of security. Look we are integrated into 'insert name of email program here'

    If the underlying resident shield part of the anti virus program is any good it will stop the launching of malicious task when they start (I think NOD32 is). If the Email program is written with security in mind (Thunderbird is) then you have to go out of your way to make things insecure enough to have a need for a third level of anti virus.
     
  13. dmaasland

    dmaasland Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2010
    Posts:
    468
    For Antispam in ESS and the ability to rescan individual e-mail items.
     
  14. SFLORG

    SFLORG Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Posts:
    15
    o_O
    We were told they had resolved and was going to be in the final version.
    Not seeing such. . . Am I missing something here?
     
  15. stratoc

    stratoc Guest

    Yes, I was a little surprised to see to add on disabled in TB on the first day of release.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.