Thoughts on Current Setup?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by mhallerman, Dec 27, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mhallerman

    mhallerman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Posts:
    180
    I hate these questions as much as the next person but... :)

    Currently use:
    1. Sandboxie to sandbox both FireFox & IE.
    2. SuperAntiSpyware resident and on-demand.
    3. NOD32 - "all" options enabled
    4. BoClean
    5. Windows Defender.

    So far with the above I have not been "hit" with anything the current setup did not handle.

    Am I missing anything critical? I'm behind a router though and I have MS Firewall turned off, but thought:

    1. Comodo might be an option.
    2. I was thinking about adding Pro-Security as a HIPS.

    Thoughts are appreciated.
    Mark.
     
  2. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    i dont know of anything critical you missed, though id remove Windows Defender.
     
  3. mhallerman

    mhallerman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Posts:
    180
    Thanks WFSUser,

    Why do you advise to remove WD? Is it redundant given SuperAntispyware?

    Also, how do you feel about adding either or both of COmodo and Pro-sec HIPS?

    Thanks,
    Mark.
     
  4. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    yes. and u also have boclean as well.
    comodo is a good firewall but given u already have a router/firewall, its inbound protection is redundant.

    u could use it for outbound security but ProSecurity can also be used for teh same purpose.
     
  5. mhallerman

    mhallerman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Posts:
    180
    Thanks again for the quick reply.

    I would gladly dump ms-wd, but Im not sure boclean nor superantispyware would notify me of added startup items and added services...That's just my current thought.

    If they don't, and if Pro-Security would, then I can get end-to-end coverage with

    1. Dumping MS WD
    2. Add no additional firewall other than the firewall in the router I currently use.
    2. The addition of Pro-Security to handle various things including outbound connection attampts.

    Thanks,
    Mark.
    -----------------------------------------------
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mhallerman
    Is it redundant given SuperAntispyware?

    yes. and u also have boclean as well.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mhallerman
    Also, how do you feel about adding either or both of COmodo and Pro-sec HIPS?

    comodo is a good firewall but given u already have a router/firewall, its inbound protection is redundant.

    u could use it for outbound security but ProSecurity can also be used for teh same purpose.
     
  6. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    are u rele keeping defender just for that? i think ProSecurity would cover those areas but i could be wrong.
     
  7. mhallerman

    mhallerman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Posts:
    180
    Sadly, yes. :)

    Will check out PS today...

    Mark.
     
  8. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046
    PS should cover that I'd look at SSM as well

    and perhaps OA as well


    Personally even behind a router I still want a firewall
     
  9. mhallerman

    mhallerman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Posts:
    180
    Thanks Starfish - I will be checking out SSM as well - I need to think about the inclusion of Comodo - I know it's very good repuation, but not sure it will be worth any additional system overhead given the other components I will be running -

    Thanks,
    Mark.
     
  10. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046
    Also take a look at OA it will include a firewall in the next version might be just what you want


    Others to consider might be Safe and Secure and Prevx
     
  11. mhallerman

    mhallerman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Posts:
    180
    Yes, was looking at OA yesterday - I had tried it in the past as well, but for some reason I can't recall had stopped using it...

    Regards,
    Mark
     
  12. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    9,177
    Hello,
    Well Mark, Mrk says that if you're happy with your setup, it looks very well.
    Mrk
     
  13. mhallerman

    mhallerman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Posts:
    180
    Thanks - it's served me well so far (but always looking to improve it)

    :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.