SysInspector versus Sysinspector EAV 4.0 Beta

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus v4 Beta Forum' started by Donald?, Nov 20, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Donald?

    Donald? Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Posts:
    30
    SysInspector stand alone application version 1.1.2.0 don't detect the process AUDIODG.EXE (Windows Vista = Windows Audio Device Graph Isolation that appears on Windows Task Manager), but SysInspector integrated on ESET EAV 4.0 Beta detects the process and classify as ROOTKIT.

    So I thing something is wrong in both versions...................:blink:
     
  2. agoretsky

    agoretsky Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,032
    Location:
    California
    Hello,

    The issue is being investigated. Thank you for your report.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky
     
  3. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Posts:
    711
    Location:
    Slovakia
    Hello, reason of better ESI in v4 is latter Antistealth module. :thumb:
     
  4. SuicidePunk

    SuicidePunk Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Posts:
    8
    The reason is Vista Protected Process, it mean Windows vista has protected this process (AUDIODG.EXE), its kind of anti piracy stuff.
    Integrated version SysInspector in ESET EAV 4, has detected the process cause it use the AV/ESET 4, scan engin ( anti stealth ).
    For more information about protected process:
    http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/vista/process_vista.mspx
     
  5. SystemJunkie

    SystemJunkie Resident Conspiracy Theorist

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Posts:
    1,500
    Location:
    Germany
    There you see how trustworthy this os is. Security through obscurity once more. The <unknown> user stacks are likely memory relocations, they use user mode rootkit technology to prevent access to audiodg, really bad, reminds me to some r3 rootkit. Never forget it is a extremely rich company who used cracked sf 4.5 to create windows xp internal soundfiles, what else to say. How should one trust in such a enterprise. A company claims to make anti-piracy-stuff but did piracy. Devilish cynism.
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.