SpyShelter Tested (with LeakTest and Commerical Keyloggers)

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by guest, Mar 27, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. guest

    guest Guest

    i tested spyshelter today with many leaktests and some commerical keyloggers.

    ver3.2 has some problem but with ver3.3 it is more powerfull.

    they added ZE (Zemana Extreme Leak Test Runner) Protection, Some new clipboard protection methods (Alpin Simulation cant bypass ver 3.3)

    i will test it with more commerical keyloggers, soon.
     

    Attached Files:

    • 1.png
      1.png
      File size:
      39.7 KB
      Views:
      2,413
    • 2.png
      2.png
      File size:
      37.2 KB
      Views:
      2,406
    • 3.png
      3.png
      File size:
      27.7 KB
      Views:
      2,391
  2. guest

    guest Guest

    i sent report to Spyshelter
    They controlled and accepted, They said that about ecodsoft clipboard test "we need up to 72 hours to make update but first need to analyze this method"
     
  3. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    this spyshelter looks like it has some feature;)
     
  4. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,468
    Yeah, looks kinda strong according to these "tests" :D
     
  5. Franklin

    Franklin Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,517
    Location:
    West Aussie
    Very nice testings guest and well laid out. :thumb:
     
  6. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    i put SpyShelter with defensewall and just for the heck of tested with the zemana keylogger test and both applications jump when keystroke wants to be log;) very nice too bad they only give 10 days for trial:D that sucks big time:)
     
  7. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,468
    LOL 10 days trial? O_O
    Kinda short hahaha
     
  8. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    yes it is very short time indeed man:mad:
     
  9. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    i am currently testing with spyware and no pop ups at all all the work it's done by DefenseWall:D man i am getting alot of pop ups from DW cool:D i always see it silent but not today:thumb:
     
  10. Thankful

    Thankful Savings Monitor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Posts:
    3,736
    Location:
    New York City
    Designed very similar to Zemana with anti-keylogger and system defense module. It would be interesting to test the system defense module against 0 day malware. This is where the real value lies.
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2010
  11. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    i am and it doesnt give me any pop ups the malware loads very easilly:D i tested like 20 malware in the wild and to me didnt protect me at all,maybe i am testing this the wrong way:D so if i am so sorry:D
     
  12. Saraceno

    Saraceno Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Posts:
    2,404
    Considering how fast people test and change programs here, that's a lifetime (licence). ;) :p
     
  13. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    you got me there buddy:D
     
  14. bellgamin

    bellgamin Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    5,648
    Location:
    Hawaii
    I'll make one short comment & then desist from further participation in this thread.

    TO WIT: Lock down outbound connections (via HIPS or Firewall or Network Monitor) & real-time, special-purpose, antikeylog apps are superfluous.
     
  15. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,047
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia/ Pakistan
    Very nice testing.

    I wonder if you could test some more applications for a comparison, like DW, GesWall, CFP, etc.
     
  16. stackz

    stackz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Posts:
    619
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    Test it with an API fuzzer and enjoy some nice BSODs. :rolleyes:
     
  17. guest

    guest Guest

    i tested spyshelter v3.3 with 11 commerical keyloggers tonight.
    i will test it with more apps
    This is test report;
     

    Attached Files:

  18. subset

    subset Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Posts:
    825
    Location:
    Austria
    @ guest

    I assume you installed Spyshelter first and then the Keyloggers.
    If so, have you tested any the other way round?

    Cos many Anti-Keyloggers fail terribly if the Keylogger was installed first, especially against the one with drivers.

    Cheers
     
  19. guest

    guest Guest

    i know so i make test with another way.

    1. install spyshelter
    2. close spyshelter protection
    3. install keylogger
    4. run keylogger, activate spying, change settings "run with windows" (and activate stealth mode if it has)
    5. restart machine
     
  20. subset

    subset Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Posts:
    825
    Location:
    Austria
    Just did one quick test with your method with Ultimate Keylogger and XP SP3.

    SpyShelter failed to block the recording of page visited, so UKL was also able to record search strings.

    UKLvsSS.png

    I have no clue if SpyShelter should protect against this, even there is this AntiNetworkSpy module with its description "It blocks HTTP/HTTPS logging..."

    Cheers
     
  21. guest

    guest Guest

    v3.3 hasnt got this protection. i didnt test http/https logging.

    :) you are lucky because when i was sleeping, v3.5 released. i didnt test ver3.5, i tested v3.3

    Now, on web site say v3.5 released, they has new module called as internet security;


    i will test this function
    But my previosly test about key/clipboard/screen activites log
    İf you test spyshelter with ultimate keylogger, spyshelter can easly block ul. keylogger.

    AntiNetworkSpy is a new function, it looks like zemana anti-ssl logger function but more powerfull. it has also anti -http, pop, smtp, ftp logger protection. But i didnt test.
     
  22. subset

    subset Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Posts:
    825
    Location:
    Austria
    Just downloaded the installer from the website and overlooked the different versions. :p
    However, SpyShelter did not even prevent the logging of sites (search strings included) with 3.5.

    I have also tried nasty Elite Keylogger from WideStep and this was strange.
    Nothing worked as expected till I removed the SpyShelter driver manually.
    Don't know if it's a conflict or the AntiKernelModeLogger from SpyShelter, but Elite Keylogger was not even able to save its settings. :doubt:

    Cheers
     
  23. guest

    guest Guest

    now, i tested spyshelter with 12 commerical keyloogger.
    This is test report;
    You can find all keyloggers on softpedia.com, you can test yourself if you want.
    new test coming
     

    Attached Files:

  24. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    551
    Location:
    Moon
    really good software:)Got it!
     
  25. guest

    guest Guest

    Now, i finished my test.
    i tested SS with about 60 commerical keylogger and 6 popular leak test.
    it is good app, easy to use and effective.

    You can verify all tests with SS v3.53, you can download all commerical keyloggers from softpedia.

    i test this software for myself, I will not test more commercial keyloggers. In ahead i will test it with real malwares which i form with RAT tools.

    This is full test report;
     

    Attached Files:

Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.