Title says it all. I'm sick of people (and companies like cnet) giving Prevx grief for their method of the evaluation version. Are they too stupid to ask Prevx for a full license so they can write a review? Mrizos on YouTube did and Prevx gave him a year license to try out. Moreover, I prefer Prevx's eval version over a 30 day full functional trial, because it's better for advanced users. A lot of PC experts who don't need a full AV per se can use Prevx's trial forever just for scanning new installs before they allow them to write to their real file system. It's great for people that do everything sandboxed with HIPS or with an LUA/SRP and don't feel they need protection, just advice on if something is malicious or not. Don't mean to rant, just saying.