Scientific Linux 6.3 released

Discussion in 'all things UNIX' started by mack_guy911, Aug 10, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mack_guy911

    mack_guy911 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Posts:
    2,677
  2. Ocky

    Ocky Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2006
    Posts:
    2,713
    Location:
    George, S.Africa
    Thanks mack_guy. Painless upgrade from 6.2 - about 243 MB.
    As a matter of interest will you use LibreOffice from the repo which is an older version, or get the latest version from their site. I am currently using a later one 3.5x downloaded from the LibreOffice site and am in two minds as to removing it in favour of the older version in the repo.
     
  3. mack_guy911

    mack_guy911 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Posts:
    2,677
    thanks yes

    i always download from source but i am using old version too 3.5.2 i guess i go for 3.6 after upgrade

    sorry to ask i forget how to upgrade i forget commands :D
     
  4. Ocky

    Ocky Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2006
    Posts:
    2,713
    Location:
    George, S.Africa
    I used the method for the cautious people. https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/howto/upgrade.6x
    except after yum --releasever=6.3 update sl-release
    I did yum update --skip-broken

    Very nice and no rpmnew or rpmsave files in yum.repos.d and priorities all preserved. :D

    btw. elrepo has patched nvidia driver:
    NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 295.71 Thu Aug 2 19:22:08 PDT 2012
    GCC version: gcc version 4.4.6 20120305 (Red Hat 4.4.6-4) (GCC)
     
  5. mack_guy911

    mack_guy911 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Posts:
    2,677
    thanks ocky i just updated right now without problem :)

    just one question i am looking for good cheap card for someone on whose system is pretty much same as mine with same install linux with windows which is best card

    http://www.flipkart.com/browse/comp...IDIA&ref=b4db1044-560a-4fb8-a6ee-d8e2d195ba9d

    i guess 520 is enough they not into gaming/eyecandy stuff but yes watch HD- movies some time :D

    also which you prefer heat sink cards or fan type my last card was heat sink 7300 i guess it last 5 years then i update to 8600gt fan type

    and i give it to my brother its still working so i guess it being 10 years now :D
     
  6. Ocky

    Ocky Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2006
    Posts:
    2,713
    Location:
    George, S.Africa
    I have the Nvidia GT 520 card with fan of course. I think it's a good one, albeit sort of low end. I don't have any problems with HD movies. 2GB video memory is pretty good.
    If the 7300 card starts to give problems, stick it in the oven to bake, then maybe another 5 years. :D :argh:
     
  7. mack_guy911

    mack_guy911 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Posts:
    2,677
  8. Ocky

    Ocky Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2006
    Posts:
    2,713
    Location:
    George, S.Africa
    Ha..ha. I will pm you my postal address. Stand by.

    Ubuntu Red Wine ? Nah, I don't think so. Give me the Kubuntu Grappa - it has more of a "K"ick. :p
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.