Sana PRSC vs Cyberhawk vs Defense wall

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by candysketch, Mar 10, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. candysketch

    candysketch Registered Member

    Mar 9, 2007
    Which one to choose:
    1. The least resource hog.
    2. Easiest to use.
    3. Performance.

    Please advise only one to choose and why. To use with system:
    Window XP PRO SP2, Firefox, Avira Antivir PE, BoClean, Comodo Pro.

    Many thanks
  2. KikiBibi

    KikiBibi Registered Member

    Oct 23, 2006
    I choose DefenseWall.

    I use IE7 with it. No more firefox/opera. No need to go through so much trouble.

    Very easy to use. Light on resource.
    Just place your browser/email/etc as untrusted and you are ready to go.
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2007
  3. Bio-Hazard

    Bio-Hazard Registered Member

    Jan 10, 2007
    Cornwall, UK
    I would also use DefenseWall. Like KikiBibi said it is very easy to use and it is light on your resources. It also had good review on
  4. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Jul 8, 2006
    I would choose DefenseWall, because it is a treathgate application

    - FireWall = Comodo
    - Treathgate = DefenseWall (this Sandbox HIPS covers the entry points to your PC, mail, Internet, P2P, chat)
    - Process level = BOCLean (generic Level process - would overlap with CyberHawk and PRSC)
    - Antivirus (data level) = Antivir
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.