[Quiz #1] Rule Creating

Discussion in 'LnS English Forum' started by Phant0m, Feb 22, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Rule Creating with Look ‘n’ Stop
    {Quiz #1}

    Not necessarily an easy thing for most but with little guidance you can conquer this easily!

    Let’s begin…

    QUESTION #1: What are the differences between 1st attached Image and the 2nd Attached Image?

    QUESTION #2: What are these two rule purpose?


    QUESTION #3: If I was to import these two rules into EnhancedRulesSet.rls, roughly where would these go?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    2nd Attachment!
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Nonono! Looks like I’m going to be forced to give all you wilders folks a failing mark…. :rolleyes:
     
  4. FluxGFX

    FluxGFX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Posts:
    667
    Location:
    Ottawa/Canada
    1 - Question

    - You changed the Source (PC) TCP/UDP port instead being in A B range to equal on a 80 www-http range

    - You change the destination (PC) TCP/UDP port from equal to an A B range with settings of 1024-5000

    - therefer altering the process of the information sending and receiving on the specified channels to match a criteria
     
  5. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Congratulations FluxGFX!!!!!!

    I’m happy to announce that you just received a karma cookie!!!!

    Remember there are still two more Questions to be answered; if you can answer them don’t hesitate! ;)
     
  6. FluxGFX

    FluxGFX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Posts:
    667
    Location:
    Ottawa/Canada
    QUESTION #2: What are these two rule purpose?

    Then I would imagine that this change would be in the purpose of running a webserver.... why would you only want pour 80 to be open and an access range to ben able to be open on range..!? am I wrong?
     
  7. FluxGFX

    FluxGFX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Posts:
    667
    Location:
    Ottawa/Canada
    You probably figured I would answer the questions lololol :)
     
  8. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Hey FluxGFX

    Alright, so which rule is meant to be a server rule and what is the purpose of the other rule? :rolleyes:
     
  9. FluxGFX

    FluxGFX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Posts:
    667
    Location:
    Ottawa/Canada
    Well second picture would be the server rule

    .... now the first picture....
    - Would it be for the allowed port range?!
     
  10. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Hey FluxGFX

    Besides noticeable differences in both those images of the rules, the 2nd attached image is of the server rule, the rule which is capable of being used to authorize OR block initiating Connections from remote machines. As for the 1st attached image, this is of a client rule, the rule which is capable of being used to authorize OR block initiating Connections to remote machines.

    I hope those karma cookies of mine are yummy! Congratulations man!!!!

    Remember there is still one more Question to be answered; if you can answer it don’t hesitate! ;)
     
  11. FluxGFX

    FluxGFX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Posts:
    667
    Location:
    Ottawa/Canada
    I'll leave that last karma cookie to someone else :)
     
  12. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Come on folks!!!!! The third question is crucial!

    And I’m not about to freely hand out the answer to it until someone makes an attempt!
     
  13. reneighd

    reneighd Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Posts:
    14
    hi phantom, is it under "tcp: block incoming connections". :doubt:

    regards,
    reneighd
     
  14. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Hey reneighd

    In reference to both rules? or?
     
  15. reneighd

    reneighd Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Posts:
    14
    hi phantom, yes both rules goes under "tcp: block incoming connections". *puppy*

    regards,
    reneighd
     
  16. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Hey reneighd

    Any client rules which authorizes TCP initiating Connections to remote machines always gets placed below the rule named “TCP : Block incoming connections”, but if you want to apply for a server you place the rules above the rule named “TCP : Block incoming connections” to authorize TCP initiating Connections from remote machines… ;)
     
  17. reneighd

    reneighd Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Posts:
    14
    hi phantom, what i meant was above not below ( it was a typo, hahahahahaha ) j/k. thanks for that info. :) ( i learned something new again :cool: )

    regards,
    reneighd :D
     
  18. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.