Prefetching and alternative defraggers

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by jdd58, Jan 26, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jdd58

    jdd58 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Posts:
    541
    Location:
    Sonoran Desert
    Is it beneficial to turn off prefetching in XP when using alternative defraggers such as jkdefrag, IObit, Defraggler and others?
     
  2. raakii

    raakii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2008
    Posts:
    593
    Please try the performance varies, tough the prefetching decreases the boot time , it increases the application load times, i keep the prefetching turned on.But please dont forget to remove unwanted prefetch entries altough windows automatically removes them.
     
  3. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,058
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    One of the biggest fallacies is to enhance performance by tinkering with the prefetch file. It is there for a reason and nothing is gained by deletion of some or all entries regardless of what some idiot "gurus" have claimed.
     
  4. raakii

    raakii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2008
    Posts:
    593
    Yes the decrease in boot times gives an illusion to users.
     
  5. jdd58

    jdd58 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Posts:
    541
    Location:
    Sonoran Desert
    I guess what I was wondering was, does windows undo the optimizations done by alternative defraggers?

    I have to admit I don’t see much if any improvement with some of these defraggers.
     
  6. raakii

    raakii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2008
    Posts:
    593
    I dont use defraggers at all.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.