Plans for a new version??

Discussion in 'LnS English Forum' started by jodu, Oct 11, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jodu

    jodu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Posts:
    29
    Hi.

    Is LnS still being developed??
    Is there any plans for a new version ??

    Thanks.
     
  2. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    276
    Location:
    Romania
    I would like to know that too ! o_O
    Frederic o_O??
     
  3. LoneWolf

    LoneWolf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Posts:
    3,408
    Same here.
     
  4. softtouch

    softtouch Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Posts:
    415
    Yes, me too.
     
  5. Mongol

    Mongol Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Posts:
    1,581
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I'd be glad to see the current version come out of Beta...:rolleyes: :eek: :)
     
  6. Frederic

    Frederic LnS Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Posts:
    4,354
    Location:
    France
    Hi jodu and all,

    Yes, there will be a new version.

    Supporting Vista (and possibly IPV6) will be the main features for this new version.

    Unfortunately, experimental features of the 2.05p3 (+ potentially "Watch Thread injection" and "Watch DNS call") won't be kept, since they are not compatible with DEP and Vista.

    Regards,

    Frederic
     
  7. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    thats good news Frederic. any rough ETA?
     
  8. LoneWolf

    LoneWolf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Posts:
    3,408
    So the only feature of a new version would be that LNS would support vista? Would any of the current features,settings,etc be updated somehow?
     
  9. LoneWolf

    LoneWolf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Posts:
    3,408
    Nevermind.Made the change to Comodo.Not bad at all.
     
  10. luozhiqi

    luozhiqi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Posts:
    23
    I stick to Look 'n' Stop since I uninstalled Jetico/Comodo.

    Look 'n' Stop should remain a pure firewall other than a complicated HIPS. Running light is its incomparable advantage.
     
  11. farmerlee

    farmerlee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,585
    I agree its lightness is one of the reasons i use it. I hope it remains a pure firewall thats light and stable.
     
  12. JerryM

    JerryM Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Posts:
    4,221
    I installed LnS probably 4 years ago. It has been an install and forget program, using the enhanced rule set.

    I hope there are no major changes.

    Best,
    Jerry
     
  13. halcyon

    halcyon Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    Posts:
    373
    I hope for the following changes:

    1) Higher number of app and internet filtering rules (128 doesn't cut it anymore)
    2) More user friendly activation system, which enables those of us who re-install often, to use LnS without having to always ask for a new
    3) Solving issue: DEP + Thread Injection = BSOD issue
    4) UI fixes: use radio buttons with XOR selections, not check boxes (check boxes are for AND or basic OR selections, not XOR)
     
  14. Defenestration

    Defenestration Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2004
    Posts:
    1,086
    Which one's in particular ?
     
  15. apm

    apm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    Posts:
    162
    lns should definitely improve its SPI feature, as now the SPI quite trouble for p2p applications, while use the free WIPFW packet filter cause no trouble to system & it can change spi slot number, dynamic rule time, maybe lns future ver should have these too.
     
  16. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,684
    Location:
    Canada
    - Yea different limits will be increased, the key question is, when and which one to be first? ;)

    - The use of checkboxes in Look ‘n’ Stop is all appropriate from what I see, correct me if I’m wrong but I just see stand-alone checkboxes which is to activate or deactivate a single features
     
  17. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,684
    Location:
    Canada
    Momentarily I do believe the Look ‘n’ Stop SPI + p2p problems are direct end result of the LooknStop TCP SPI simultaneous connections limit (max-allowed, 256). And this is supposed to be fixed with v2.06 release … and sadly to say, it is unknown to date when a release date will be for that…

    I do wish though, that the Look ‘n’ Stop SPI implementation will begin taking form of shared SPI characteristics, LooknStop SPI should really be informational when logging. … "Out of connection", "Invalid Flags", "Invalid Acknowledge Number", "Invalid Sequence Number", "Incoming connection limit reached", "Outgoing connection limit reached", "Half-open connection limit reached"

    So far, all we know when we all ever see the Look ‘n’ Stop SPI loggings; this could be only just direct result of "Half-open connection limit reached", and can we actually be sure the lns SPI implementation is even proper (No offence to Fred :p )….
     
  18. halcyon

    halcyon Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    Posts:
    373
    Network interfaces selection screen.

    At least on my system, I have two options and if I click one, the other one is automatically deselected.

    So, it functions like a radio button (XOR), so it should look like a radio button, not a checkbox.
     
  19. Frederic

    Frederic LnS Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Posts:
    4,354
    Location:
    France
    This is actually a listview control with the LVS_EX_CHECKBOXES attribute.
    There is no LVS_EX_RADIOBUTTON attribute...

    Frederic
     
  20. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,684
    Location:
    Canada
    Internet-filtering rules edit bug

    Hi Frederic

    When activating or deactivating the logging flag for a rule that is set for application, the rule becomes active (though still shown with deactivated attribute) even though there no application even launched…
     
  21. Frederic

    Frederic LnS Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Posts:
    4,354
    Location:
    France
    Hi Phant0m,

    I was not able to reproduce that.
    Are you really talking about the Application filtering page ?
    If I understand well, if an application doesn't have the green checkbox on the left side, and you press the ! attribute, then, when you start the application there is no alert ? the application is allowed or blocked (and logged) ?

    Thanks,

    Frederic
     
  22. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,684
    Location:
    Canada
    Hi Fred

    Thanks for responding.

    No, I’m talking about Applications being set on a rules on 'Internet Filtering' screen
     
  23. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,684
    Location:
    Canada
    On the Internet filtering screen, the application feature available through the ‘Rule Editing’ dialog, to associates an application or applications with rule…

    • When activating or de-activating the logging flag on a rule that is set with application or applications, the rule becomes activate (even though the rule still shown with a deactivated attribute), and the associated application or applications NOT even running.
    • Also, when rule that’s associated with an application, and becomes active by the execution / connecting of that associated application, making changes to just the logging state causes the rule to stay activated after the application disconnects and even closes out…

    Here is a couple anyways….
     
  24. Neoxellos

    Neoxellos Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Posts:
    60
    Hi, will this include Vista64 ?
     
  25. GreenWhite

    GreenWhite Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Posts:
    110
    Hope the new version will really come out.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2006
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.