PC World AV Chart

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by eBBox, Apr 23, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    ...of your own, of course! :rolleyes:

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
  2. egghead

    egghead Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Posts:
    443
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Kaspersky nummero uno: this test must be reliable !!!!!!:D :D :D

    Not much value is given to responsetime to new threats ("deliver signatures for new malware"). I think responsetime is a keyfactor in an AV.

    Having written that, I don't agree with ranking Symantec/Norton nr. 2: the slowest of all in reacting.
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2007
  3. Albinoni

    Albinoni Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Posts:
    711
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    No wrong, lets get the facts right here. PC World is purely a magazine thats full of ads and (2) VB have been in the AV testing business far more longer than PC World ever will be and this is what their specialty is.
     
  4. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,529
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO

    Maybe they are trying to change that with the additon of SONAR... I could be wrong though.
     
  5. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,929
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma

    Actually it does have an http scanner===Sonar
     

    Attached Files:

  6. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    I dont think it is posssible for Avast and AVG to beat NOD32 with best possible settigns. So maybe IBK is right.
     
  7. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,226
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Are you saying that the PC-Welt test performed earlier is also performed with default settings and not maximum settings? That test also showed Avast to be better than NOD32, and AVG Professional edition to be hot on the heels of NOD32.

    In September 2006 PC-Welt test, NOD32 was slightly above Avast and AVG. In November 2006 PC-Welt test, Avast was above NOD32 and NOD32 came between AVG and Avast. And now both Avast and AVG have surpassed NOD32. See a pattern? :)

    The standard settings argument is a rumour at this moment, it is largely unconfirmed. I do remember reading somewhere that Andreas Marx likes to "turn on everything" (i.e. max settings) for all AVs in his tests. :)
     
  8. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    I agree. If I remember right, NOD32 with standard settings doesn't use Advanced Heuristics (AH) at all in On-Demand scan. How could NOD32 score 79 % in proactive test then in Av-test.org test without AH? No way! :rolleyes: As always, this "standard settings" is only used in here to underestimate Avast's and AVG's success. :mad:

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
  9. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,875
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    why no one mails to Marx and asks about the settings and let us know? I am interested in the answer too.
     
  10. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,226
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    If I give you his email ID, will you contact him? :)

    I'm a bit apprehensive about contacting him, thats why I haven't sent off an email yet.
     
  11. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,226
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    I have sent an email to Andreas Marx asking this question. I hope he replies to me. :)
     
  12. extratime

    extratime Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Posts:
    100
    I emailed Andreas yesterday asking this very question. Andreas replied forwarding my email to Erik Larkin (of PC World) who would answer.

    I am awaiting a reply from Erik.
     
  13. extratime

    extratime Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Posts:
    100
    Ok I got a reply from Erik Larken of PC World. He confirmed that the on-demand detection tests were performed using the best settings of the respective AVs.

    As a further note he added that system slowdown tests (performed in the PC World labs) were done using the default settings of the respective AVs.
     
  14. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,529
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO

    I did not know that, thanks bigc.
     
  15. PcBorg

    PcBorg Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Posts:
    28
    you know what... it really seems that norton is stepping up and starting to really step up and become leaders in the antimalware world...
     
  16. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    they have always been top dog, or near enough ....

    they only got bad reviews due to un-installing errors / liveupdate errors and for being damn heavy on system performance,

    2007 have fixed all these, and finally! about time :D
     
  17. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,529
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO

    Isn't competition great? I think over the past couple of years Symantec realized that the little fish were starting to make big waves in the antivirus pond.
     
  18. jrspie

    jrspie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Posts:
    37
    I think I'll just jump out a window and be done with it.
    I just paid for NOD32 2 days ago.
    Also, I'm wondering why GDATA AVK and AntiVir weren't tested.
    Reading AV Comparatives, these 2 anti viruses seem to be on the top of the pile.
    (*&^*&^%&*^$%&$%#^- I'm really disgusted. Whatever happened to NOD32's long running high scores in the tests?
    Oh well.
    Bye.
    J.
     
  19. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,226
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Well, that confirms it then. AVG And Avast! have indeed surpassed NOD32 according to this test. A few things I've noted in the past few days:

    1) AV-test.org seems to have always provided a more accurate viewpoint of NOD32's detection rates. I don't know why. Always there is a noticeable difference in detection rates between NOD32 at AV-test.org and NOD32 at AV-comparatives. Also, I do remember there were disputes between Eset and AV-test in the past, but I do not know whether this has any bearing on this test (I don't think so).

    Of course, NOD32 has the best heuristic engine as always. ;)

    2) AVG seems to have slowly earned a Norton-like reputation for being "bad". Like NAV, which is continuously bahsed despite its improvements in recent years, AVG is also facing the same today. I've seen quite a few who can't believe that AVG improved to this extent.

    3) Avast! is the quiet one, and even this AV shows difference in detection rates between AV-test and AV-comparatives. Overall it provides good protection which is at least on par with NOD32 (excluding heuristics of course).

    4) I find that some people are finding it hard to believe that BitDefender scored on par with Kaspersky. In all AV-test.org tests, BitDefender has always been very close to Kaspersky, and Symantec has been very close to KAV as well, sometimes exceeding KAV's detection rates. This behaviour is not seen in AV-comparatives however, but still BitDefender, KAV and Symantec were were close to each other (between 1 to 1.5%), which means they still offer pretty much the same protection level.

    IMO BitDefender is the most "balanced" AV with a good mix of high signature and heuristic detection, an almost winning combination if it wasn't for the high resource usage.

    It will be even more interesting if I could find out how many samples of each malware type was used in the test. :)
     
  20. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,529
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO

    Maybe the sample size is close to what Frug posted in an older thread about PC-Welt.

    New german PC-Welt Test by av-test.org From Nov 2006
     
  21. Thankful

    Thankful Savings Monitor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Posts:
    5,988
    Location:
    New York City
    NOD32 scored an 84, the same score as Symantec and BitDefender. I certainly wouldn't say it is behind Avast and AVG. Are we looking at the same test??
     
  22. jrspie

    jrspie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Posts:
    37
    It's interesting that AVK and Avira scored high in both tests.
    And, by the way, you guys aren't helping matters any. After reading what you said I now am upgraded to positively suicidal.
    I wonder if i could get my money back.
    J.
     
  23. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,751
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Suggest you read post #16 in this thread and and relax. https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=172626 ;) Your money was well spent.
     
  24. Thankful

    Thankful Savings Monitor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Posts:
    5,988
    Location:
    New York City
  25. EliteKiller

    EliteKiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Posts:
    1,138
    Location:
    TX
    ....and compatability issues. :p
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.