OPEN QUESTION TO LEAPFROG (Todd)

Discussion in 'FirstDefense-ISR Forum' started by Genady Prishnikov, Dec 17, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Genady Prishnikov

    Genady Prishnikov Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Posts:
    350
    Could you explain what led to the crippled version of FD-ISR?
    Simple question. Inquiring minds want to know - the truth.
    It gets down to trust between a developer and users. What's done is done, but can you PLEASE simply answer why?
     
    Genady Prishnikov, Dec 17, 2007
    #1
  2. Leapfrog Software

    Leapfrog Software Leapfrog Management

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2006
    Posts:
    251
    Location:
    Northern Nevada, USA
    I am not at liberty to discuss this matter at this time.
     
    Leapfrog Software, Dec 17, 2007
    #2
  3. Genady Prishnikov

    Genady Prishnikov Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Posts:
    350
    Because....it's in a contract somewhere?
    Because....o_O?
    This affected a lot of people and just saying you're not at liberty to talk about it is not being very upfront with the end-user.
    Stonewalling never works in business. Never has. Never will.
    But thanks for at least telling us that you can't tell us. For what it's worth.
     
    Genady Prishnikov, Dec 17, 2007
    #3
  4. Acadia

    Acadia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Posts:
    4,332
    Location:
    US
    Genady, take a deep breath and count to ten, it's just not THAT important (and besides, now that Todd is back :cool: , we don't want to scare him away! :D ).

    Acadia
     
    Acadia, Dec 17, 2007
    #4
  5. Genady Prishnikov

    Genady Prishnikov Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Posts:
    350
    Fair enough. Counting now...
     
    Genady Prishnikov, Dec 17, 2007
    #5
  6. TouchuvGrey

    TouchuvGrey Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2004
    Posts:
    441
    Location:
    Gold Coast Queensland Australia
    Can you tell us when you will be able to discuss it ?
     
    TouchuvGrey, Dec 20, 2007
    #6
  7. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    This is a round about way of trying to get him to talk about something he plainly isn't going to do. Better to leave it until he is ready. Besides it isn't going to change anything.
     
    Peter2150, Dec 20, 2007
    #7
  8. tradetime

    tradetime Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Posts:
    1,000
    Location:
    UK
    I'd be inclined to agree, clearly Todd reads the boards from time to time, and given there has been a great deal of comment and speculation over fd-isr I'm sure he would have commented if he were at liberty to do so.
     
    tradetime, Dec 20, 2007
    #8
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...