Nod32 detection rates

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by jg88swe, Aug 27, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jg88swe

    jg88swe Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Posts:
    181
  2. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
  3. jg88swe

    jg88swe Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Posts:
    181
    heh yeah.. but the tests are very diffrent... VB100% only test samples from Wildlist org.
     
  4. JimIT

    JimIT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,035
    Location:
    Denton, Texas
    Wrong.

    To achieve the VB100 award, the AV has to detect 100% of the WL samples with no false positives. However, WL samples are not the only thing tested.
    :D
     
  5. jg88swe

    jg88swe Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Posts:
    181
    yeah but they test only "famous"(or a high risk infection) malwares...

    Av-Compratives test all kinds of malwares
     
  6. TAP

    TAP Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Posts:
    344
    Hi,

    You should not disappoint with these results and as its name says NOD32 is an Anti-virus/worm software not Anti-trojan/other malware. In these results NOD32 is good at virus/worm detection as it should supposed to be. This doesn't mean NOD32 is not good at viruses/worms detection, NOD32 is one of the best at viruses/worms detection as you can see in Virus Bulletin tests.

    If you want an Anti-virus software that have a good detection rates not only viruses/worms but good at other malware such as trojans, backdoors, spyware you should consider Kaspersky or McAfee instead of NOD32. You have to know what your Anti-virus software really does not because its advertisement so you can choose what really suits to your needs.

    Virus Bulletin, as its name says its test suit mainly focuses on only ITW viruses/worms, Zoo viruses/worms are also tested but may not count and other malware are not included in Virus Bulletin test.

    You can not judge the quality of an Anti-virus by only count a number of VB100% logoes but you have to consider other available test results that conduct by other testers too.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2004
  7. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,819
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    Have a look to the "overview" page that is under the comparatives. NOD32 has "advance" detection rate of zoo-samples, which the tester (I) calls as "very good". (and an "advanced+" in the retrospective test, which is even better - excellent ;) ).
     
  8. sard

    sard Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Posts:
    175
    Location:
    UK
    I don't see why there's a distinction between Trojan and Virus detection when it comes to AVs (Yes I know AV stands for Anti-Virus but ROM stands for Read Only Memory and you get rewritable ones these days). They can both have definitions released for them once they've been identified so there's no excuse. You're just as likely if not more so to encounter a trojan these days so AVs that don't target trojans are not acceptable.

    Why might it be harder to identify a trojan than a virus. For that matter what's the difference? Haven't the lines been blurred :doubt:
     
  9. optigrab

    optigrab Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Posts:
    624
    Location:
    Brooklyn/NYC USA
    It will never get through my thick skull that 99.9% detection is really the only criteria for selecting which AV to use. Nor can I seem to grasp the obvious point that 94.96% just plain sucks. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
    Hmmm, which one should I be more concerned with?

    That reminds me, I should go downtown (NYC) and get my malaria booster shots. :ninja:
     
  10. Stan999

    Stan999 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Posts:
    566
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX USA
    However, from my experence NOD also detects some real world current infections prior to KAV or McAfee.
    Example: https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=42010
    This has occured a number of times.

    I run NOD and BOClean on a P4 2.8 machine that is used for gaming.
    To me that is a great combination and no noticable effect with the real time protection running on both NOD and BOClean.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.