NOD on position 16

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by Steel, May 23, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Steel

    Steel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Posts:
    219
  2. dsmith4087

    dsmith4087 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Posts:
    1
    Last edited by a moderator: May 23, 2007
  3. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    Crappy tests !
    Why ? Do you believe Symantec gets more than Kaspersky and NOD32 ?
    Do you believe Rasing AV is better than NOD , AVG , the other competition ?

    I don't believe . Real world results show completely different numbers !
     
  4. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    Don't underestimate Symantec just because their NAV2004/2005/2006 line was crappy...
     
  5. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    I don't , but simply NOD and KAV are better than them .

    You comment about Rasing ...

    One unreal thing makes the whole test fake
     
  6. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    It's a test done by AV-Test.org, the largest and most respected AV testing organization of the world.
     
  7. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    I will comment further on Rising in the other thread.

    As far as NOD32 is concerned, I see the "real world results" argument is being brought up again after years of disuse. If you noticed, AV-test's trojan samples seem to be more numerous overall than AV-comparatives, and since its a larger sample set, that itself would account for much of the differences. Andreas Marx even visited the AV-testing workshop held recently. He is held in great respect in the industry. If you are saying AV-test is unreliable, then I don't know what to say....

    NOD32's results are as reliable as they get, and the truth is that AV-test.org's tests have never been friendly towards NOD32. And since the sample set in this case was larger than AV-comparatives, and considering that the garbage level is about the same as AV-comparatives (or maybe less because again AV-test has more resources so maybe they can sort this out better), which is a very low amount and not likely to impact test results significantly, for the detection of Worms/Trojans/Bots/Zombies it seems AV-test is the more reliable test for the moment...
     
  8. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,526
    Location:
    Arkham Asylum
    Is it really necessary to post this topic here when it already exists in the "other anti-virus software" thread?
     
  9. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,726
    Location:
    Texas
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.