Nightly v9, have u already tried it?

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by sweater, Sep 25, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sweater

    sweater Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Philippines, the Political Dynasty Capital of the
    As of now I am just using Mozilla Nightly 7. It runs flawlessly fast in my system. ;)

    Just wondering if any of you here are already using Nightly v9 without problem. Coz I know that this is for testing only purposes builds. :rolleyes: o_O

    http://nightly.mozilla.org/
     
  2. ReverseGear

    ReverseGear Guest

    I used it for more than a week and experienced no crash or issues
     
  3. HealingStargate

    HealingStargate Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    160
    Location:
    USA
    Yes, using 'nightly' with no problems.
    I do prefer OPERA however, but keep a few other browsers available.
    KOR-
     
  4. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
  5. malexous

    malexous Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Posts:
    830
    Location:
    Ireland
    I have the 64-bit version installed in Arch Linux and Windows 7. Both run fine, although I have not used it much in Arch Linux.
     
  6. sweater

    sweater Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Philippines, the Political Dynasty Capital of the
    Any noticeable performance improvements specially on surfing speed...whatever? :oops: o_O .... coz if there's none, then, I'll just continue on using my Nightly v7.
     
  7. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    I gave it a try. It's alright in terms of performance and even stability but it's not like they've made the serious changes they need to for it to replace Chrome or even IE9.
     
  8. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    I'm not even up to date on Aurora, lol. I got sick of downloading a new update every day. So no, I have tried it.

    @Hungryman: You're right, the stability and performance is there, but if I know you well enough now, the kind of changes you're wanting probably are a long way down the pipe, if ever.
     
  9. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    Yes, they do have an open project for splitting Firefox tabs etc into multiple processes but only for stability/ performance and not for security, which they've only noted as "maybe sometime down the line we'll look at this."
     
  10. ReverseGear

    ReverseGear Guest

    Why r u on nightly seven when beta of seven is out for so long...and wait a day or two..7 final is on the way
     
  11. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,102
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    i use aurora myself just because of a few past issues with nightly. but for the most part nightly was not bad just a few bugs i saw here and there. aurora for sure is better and usually more stable its at version 8.02 now
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.