New Virusinfo test

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Sjoeii, Dec 6, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O

    Attached Files:

  2. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    drweb does 'ok' on this one, shame its not the same at the moment on reputable tests.
     
  3. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    Dr Web is doing great indeed.
    Well done. I like this test
     
  4. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Posts:
    711
    Location:
    Slovakia
    Hi!

    These tests haven't got objective results, because on virustotal a lot of damaged files are uploaded. I had got one sample of Win32/Nuwar and I tested that on virustotal. Eight antiviruses detect malware, but file was corrupted, so there wasn't any risk. There is important if antivirus detects only functional malware. Finally, I don't see something about false positives.

    :thumb:
     
  5. Franklin

    Franklin Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,517
    Location:
    West Aussie
    They should put in an extra button alongside of Detection, Heuristics, Suspicious and Pack/Crypt.

    Name it something like "Managed to do SFA" and throw in some decent security apps like Sandboxie, Defensewall, Geswall, Safespace and Returnil to name a few.:D
     
  6. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    exactly, that's why I ain't sure about this so-called test

    hmm
     
  7. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    Haha
    You lost your trust in Dr Web? :p

    These guys are real hard core virus junks. I trust this test. Beautifull thing is that they so the same test each month

    But there are too many tests these days, I agree
     
  8. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    interesting results. Avira as usual among the first 2. :p
     
  9. Wordward

    Wordward Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Posts:
    707
    Does anyone know which version of AVG was tested? Pro or Anti-Malware?
     
  10. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    aye, a little

    but we shall see how things 'move-along'

    hopefully.
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2007
  11. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    I believe it is anti malware
     
  12. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,012
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    wow i never thought much of avg.. i mean they are a decent all around product but have never realy stood out in the testing.. wonder how well they will do next month maybe this was a good test for them since last month they did pretty good but no where near what they did this time

    suprisingly kaspersky did a lot worse this time than i would have guessed..
     
  13. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    could someone post some info on the actual test/testers.

    how reliable, as they dont really match av-comp/av-test.
     
  14. JerryM

    JerryM Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Posts:
    4,221
    AVG AV + AVG AS = AVGAM really makes a difference. It has taken AVG out of the ranks of the "also rans."

    Jerry
     
  15. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    drweb always does well in 'these tests' but poor in all the others, so i 'have to' question the test itself.

    however, its still nice to see drweb do well in a test. :p

    so now i wonder, how would drweb + prevx do? ;)

    in this test, prevx1 (why not 2.0?) detects more than avast,norton,mcafee,microsoft and a few more.

    nobody knows, but still...... curious.
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2007
  16. henryg

    henryg Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2005
    Posts:
    293


    It seems like AVG is doing well enough to acquired a company called: Exploit Prevention Labs.


    http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2228171,00.asp
     
  17. Diver

    Diver Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Posts:
    1,444
    Location:
    Deep Underwater
    henryg, you left out a word that makes your post ambiguous.

    Grisoft bought the other company.
     
  18. Wordward

    Wordward Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Posts:
    707
    I still wonder if AVG Pro or Anti-Malware was used. Did anyone see where it may say this?
     
  19. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,012
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    i didnt mean as a company i mean in testing they always do pretty deent but never top out the tests i dont think ive seen that in a long time if ever...im sure as a company they are fine as there are a lot of avg users out there..if they keep that pace up thought they may be the next one to beat..im just suprised to see such a large junp from the last tests for them.. not usually the norm unless they used a new verson or a updated program
     
  20. Macstorm

    Macstorm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,531
    Location:
    Sneffels volcano
    Expected results, taking into account the testing method. :cool:
     
  21. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    i wouldn't say expected results, but yeah.... have to question the test.

    50+ samples taken from VirusTotal, and checked across a selection of AV programs.

    honestly, anyone could do this.
     
  22. AndreyKa

    AndreyKa Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2005
    Posts:
    93
    Location:
    Russia
    Not so.
    50+ samples taken from infected machines, and checked on VirusTotal.
     
  23. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    how are the samples checked, virustotal? Hardly conclusive
     
  24. Diver

    Diver Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Posts:
    1,444
    Location:
    Deep Underwater
    Its too small of a sample and would be biased against market leaders as they would be the most likely AV's in use on a random selection of machines. Essentially its a selection of what the market leaders missed.
     
  25. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    thought id have a go, quickly put together, but you get the picture.

    with some valid malware from my collection ;) (all types)

    @IBK :D ... worth a go eh? but not your suggestion... i choose virscan instead of virustotal :D

    enjoy :cool:

    test.png


    Drweb + prevx would score 50 aswell together, as the misses were on different files ;)

    just shows how easy these kind of tests are.

    note: one file undetected by drweb, IS detected by drweb on my computer, so its not 100% effective.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2007
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.