New PG

Discussion in 'ProcessGuard' started by Rico, Apr 16, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rico

    Rico Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,702
    Location:
    Texas
    Hi, Will PG 3.3 be released in non-Beta, or final version? Will th final version update the current beta?

    Thanks & Take Care
    rico
     
  2. Disciple

    Disciple Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Posts:
    292
    Location:
    Ellijay, Georgia - USA
    I am confident it will be one day.

    The practice of always uninstalling beta software before installing the release version is something that should be done. In theory, there should be little difference between the last beta and the release version. However any difference could be the the one that causes the software to no run correctly if at all on your computer.

    HTH, take care.
     
  3. redwolfe_98

    redwolfe_98 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Posts:
    581
    Location:
    South Carolina, USA
    i think a PG 4 would be nice, if it is possible, where, instead of PG's automatically blocking things, like "services wanted to install a driver", it would popup an alert saying "services tried to install a driver: allow?/block?
     
  4. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    it would be great if PG could be like AppDefend and let u select between allow, prompt, and block.

    PG's learning mode also has a few issues, it initially blocks privileges then allows them.

    PG 4 is so far away :(
     
  5. EASTER.2010

    EASTER.2010 Guest

    I wouldn't be so quick to frown. Sometimes perfecting on a quality invention takes more time than we like but the end results seem to always turn up more than you expected in the first place.
     
  6. Rainwalker

    Rainwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Posts:
    2,106
    Location:
    USA
    This would be WONDERFUL !
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.