My benchmark is better than yours (again)

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/22/douglas_crockford_javascript_benchmark/

IE10 tops this one with Chrome 10 coming in last. What could be more fair? Both are "version 10"

 

Oh this should be an interesting thread, lol. But I couldn't care less how IE 10 performs on this test, the browser barely exists yet. Let's see what happens when the "bulk" is put in.

 

Not fair, he should compare the Preview with Canary or at least Dev. Same with other browsers.

It's like comparing a latest prototype with a mass-produced product.

 

It's all trivial to me that browser A is .001 millaseconds faster than B. I'm more concerned with features, and security. There all getting pretty fast these days.

 

The data states a 2.239 second or 2239.000 millisecond difference. Do you care about that?

 

The data states a 2.239 second difference at what? At executing which benchmark using what code? At analyzing the JSLint source code using JSLint itself?

Yes, I can see why we should care about that.

 

I like to see progress, and improvement, but my priorities are with features, and most of all "Security". No disrespect intended. Are they measuring the amount of time it takes for the browser to complete loading after clicking on it or the time it takes to load a webpage. The later would be more important to me.

 

Hmmm ... I wonder how long this thread lasts beyond St George's Day? LOL

 

Closing the thread in the spirit of browser tolerance amongst others.