missed signature !!

Discussion in 'ESET Smart Security' started by stimulator32, Aug 14, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. stimulator32

    stimulator32 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Posts:
    104
    Hello,


    1.jpg


    2.jpg


    Any interpretation ?

    Many Thanks ..
     
  2. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,728
    Location:
    Texas
    It looks like you should submit that file to ESET.
     
  3. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    You can submit it but not necessarily, the point is the file was detected and blocked. Of course you won't find that detection in the database as it'd be like if you searched for a description of the NewHeur_PE detection.
     
  4. stimulator32

    stimulator32 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Posts:
    104
    I am not convinced with this answer !

    Look Marcos, when eset says "a variant of Win32/conficker worm" that mean the "conficker" signature is included in the database and the detected file is a variant of it.

    So, when eset said "a variant of Win32/Sapik trojan" that mean the trojan "Sapik" ia included in the database and the detected file is a variant of it !

    This is the point what I didn't understand "Why I didn't find the signature Win32/Sapik" ?!
     
  5. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    It's a heuristic detection like NewHeur_PE.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.