McAfee 2009 Range now available

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by vijayind, Sep 10, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gery

    gery Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,175
    can someone please tell if it works well on vista and what is the impact that it has on the computers RAM and CPU? thanks
     
  2. vijayind

    vijayind Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Posts:
    1,413
    Yes, its Vista compatible ( has been since 2008 range).
    On my system it uses 60 MB of RAM during normal usage.
     
  3. Fly

    Fly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Posts:
    2,201
    That's optimistic.

    On my Windows XP system mcshield.exe has on occasion consumed more than 100 MB RAM.
     
  4. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Damn, ya think folks would be happy just to see, McAfee finally looking towards the sky, and not the ground.;)
     
  5. vijayind

    vijayind Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Posts:
    1,413
    I clocked it when I had FF3 open only. Nothing else. The scanner component took 40 MB for me.

    When I ran a scan, it shot up to 120 MB RAM, but thats for on-demand scan. So unless you where opening many processes or accessing a folder with many executables, the memory usage should be between 60-80 MB for most cases.
     
  6. DasFox

    DasFox Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Posts:
    1,825
    So McAfee is still bloated?

    If so it needs to wakeup to the reality that Symantec saw and start creating a lightweight application...

    I use to think McAfee was something, and that was like 8-10 years ago...
     
  7. wenbin

    wenbin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Posts:
    2
    My McAfee has 15 months subscription:D
     
  8. apm

    apm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    Posts:
    164
    Looks like only Mcafee anf F-secure are left in the bloated list now for 2009 versions.
     
  9. gery

    gery Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,175
    It is obvious
     
  10. icr

    icr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Posts:
    1,589
    Location:
    UK
    I have NIS 09 on my comp it uses abt 7-10 MBs under idle conditions
    and 50-60 Mbs during on-demand scanning thats quite lighter than Mcafee:argh: :argh: :argh: :argh:
     
  11. gery

    gery Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,175
    Norton IS is a very light. Lets say Avg paid which i am using now takes a good deal of 57000k at normal state and i am talking about the Av as i don't know the suite how much ram uses.Bullguard IS is light and Trend Micro 2009 is light as a suite but it causes browsing slow down . Norton doesn't
     
  12. vijayind

    vijayind Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Posts:
    1,413
    McAfee 2009 reviewed by PcMag.
    http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2332734,00.asp

     
  13. RobZee

    RobZee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Posts:
    290
    Location:
    Texas
    For some unknown (to me) reason, AT&T switched their internet security suite from Norton 2009 (which was light & speedy as others have noted) to McAfee 2009, which is sluggish and froze my new computer under two different FDISR snapshots. Removed it ASAP and all is back to normal again. Don't know causes of McAfee's problems on my system, but there are too many easily available alternatives for me to spend any time with it.

    Rob
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.