Malwarebyte's Antimalware review by MRG

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by nikanthpromod, Dec 29, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nikanthpromod

    nikanthpromod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Posts:
    1,369
    Location:
    India
  2. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Interesting review as a previous review I read said to stay with the free version as the implementation of real time protection in the paid version wasn't very good. Different review, different result. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2345349,00.asp
     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2009
  3. nikanthpromod

    nikanthpromod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Posts:
    1,369
    Location:
    India
    that review is about v1.36 which didnt include ip blocking.

    MRG used v1.42 pro.

    In my experience its ip blocking and detection of rogues is very very effective.:thumb:
     
  4. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
  5. nikanthpromod

    nikanthpromod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Posts:
    1,369
    Location:
    India
  6. Keyboard_Commando

    Keyboard_Commando Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2009
    Posts:
    690
    Interesting they (MRG) now think Malwarebytes is a decent tool, aka "extra level of protection working right next to your primary Anti-Malware application".

    Too bad MRG lost a lot of credibility back when they were trying to bash the very same product.

    Maybe this is a new years olive branch to the makers of Malwarebytes.
     
  7. Saraceno

    Saraceno Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Posts:
    2,405
  8. andyman35

    andyman35 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    2,336
    The ludicrous and totally unwarranted levels of animosity toward MBAM from this group was the main reason that it lost any credibility for me.However this does seem to be a welcome change of stance.

    Personally I don't need any test to show me the value of MBAM,personal experience on many occasions where it's found and removed malware tells me all I need to know.:thumb:
     
  9. Saraceno

    Saraceno Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Posts:
    2,405
    Well MBAM has always had a lot of supporters, but if they can win over those who were most critical, then that says a lot about the strength of their product.
     
  10. nosirrah

    nosirrah Malware Fighter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Posts:
    560
    Location:
    Cummington MA USA

    The PM had a lot of new tech added since 1.36 as well . This tech when added to IP blocking makes getting 0day on a lot of threats easier . To a lesser degree the new tech makes the scanner better as well but its intention was to deal with polymorphic threats predicatively .
     
  11. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Will it work on a 64 bit machine?
     
  12. LoneWolf

    LoneWolf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Posts:
    3,784
  13. PC__Gamer

    PC__Gamer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    526
    lol, true indeed ;)

    MRG? ... is this really the level of testing and reviews we all except now-a-days?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.