KeyScrambler Personal 1.1.1

Discussion in 'privacy technology' started by gismo999, Sep 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. true north

    true north Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Posts:
    159
    Hi Pete (spy1),

    thanks, I will try it again.

    true north
     
  2. true north

    true north Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Posts:
    159
    Hi Pete (spy1),

    I tried the entire process again but failed. Downloading and installation was o.k. but on all the pages the same message:
    "This page is not
    Encryption module error"
    All the same problems to write a post here with WIN Dr. Watson Debugger and shut down the browser when I touched
    my keyboard and started typing.
    anyways...thanks for your advise
    true north
     
  3. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    How hard is it for a trojan defeat keyscrambler? Apparently, not very hard.

    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ZJEVNRE9

    A lot of trojans, even old (Haxdoor, Metafisher, Goldun) already do this (capture http post), and I doubt this extension has much to offer against kernel-level keyloggers as well.
     
  4. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    KeyScrambler

    :rolleyes:
    You can download a brief video of just how much "anything you enter in the Web browser is protected against keyloggers" here: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ZJEVNRE9

    This was done through a simple application that doesn't even need to install kernel-level hooks of any kind. Hell, you don't even need to install it.

    My thoughts? KeyScrambler is useless and certainly doesn't do what it claims to do.
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2007
  5. spy1

    spy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Posts:
    3,139
    Location:
    Clover, SC
    TNT - What was the link supposed to do (or what was I supposed to have done when I got there)?

    On the wonderful little page that came up about the Art Institute I started typing in a fictious name and KeyScrambler went right ahead and encrypted the keystrokes - was that what I was supposed to have tried, or what? Pete
     
  6. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    What the hell are you talking about? Art Institute?
     
  7. spy1

    spy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Posts:
    3,139
    Location:
    Clover, SC
    IN IE last night, I got a completely different page than I got just now in FireFox (it included a pop-up advertisement for the school I was telling you about in the other post).

    Very interesting clip. I'll email it to the developer and see what he has to say about it. Thank you. Pete
     
  8. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    Oh yeah Megaupload does that sometimes.
     
  9. spy1

    spy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Posts:
    3,139
    Location:
    Clover, SC
    In regard to some comments in this thread:

    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=161474

    I got the following response from KeyScramblers' developer (email re-printed in full with his permission) :

    Pete,

    The poster "TNT" appears to use HTTP Interceptor to record the http
    traffic from his browser. HTTP Interceptor is a pseudo-proxy which
    requires setting up your browser to use a local proxy, in effect sending
    all your data to HTTP Interceptor. It should not be surprising that it
    is then able to record that data. Just as if you went to a phishing
    website and entered your password, KeyScrambler can do nothing to
    prevent that site from capturing your password. There are other more
    appropriate tools for such threats.

    Please keep in mind that KeyScrambler is designed to defeat just
    keyloggers. It is not a comprehensive security suite or a silver-bullet
    against all forms of data capturing and we have never claimed it to be.
    What it does is provide an extra layer of protection against a specific
    threat. We have thus far not heard of anyone coming up with a keylogger
    that KeyScrambler cannot defeat. And if we ever do, you can be sure
    that we will address it appropriately and promptly.

    Best regards,

    Qian

    --
    Qian Wang
    QFX Software Corporation

    ======================================================

    As I am in here way over my head, I'll simply leave it at that. :D Pete
     
  10. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    Correct.

    There are trojans that do this, so this is not just related to phishing sites.

    Well, it does say that it prevents all data sent through a browser to be captured, doesn't it? :cautious:

    As I said in the PM, KeyScrambler probably defeats some keyloggers, but to think this is a strong protection against all forms of data capture used by real-life password-logging threats is wrong. There are known and widespread "PSW" trojans for which this utility can't do anything. And yes, those trojans work on web pages logins.
     
  11. spy1

    spy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Posts:
    3,139
    Location:
    Clover, SC
    I believe what Qian's saying is that the software you've got on your computer is by-passing what KS does due to the way it's set up there, thus skewing your perception of what would be happening in a real environment on someone else's computer who was using KS.

    Is there any way that can be checked? Pete
     
  12. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    Well, if he's saying that, he's wrong. Haxdoor, to name one, does http post capture.
     
  13. spy1

    spy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Posts:
    3,139
    Location:
    Clover, SC
    TNT - I think one of the main communication problems we're having here is that you're basing everything you're saying on the scenario where someone's already infected with something like Haxdoor.

    I'm not.

    I'm basing my viewpoint from the perspective of someone who is not already infected with anything (there are those of us who aren't, you know).

    So - lacking a pre-existing infection of some sort (which would enable that malware to by-pass KS's protection), are you maintaining that KS would not protect someone's computer?

    If so, why? And please provide me with a direct link to somewhere that I can actually prove it for myself. Thank you. Pete
     
  14. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    If you're not infected with anything, you don't have to worry about malicious software logging your keystrokes or your login forms. In that case, the only way one can snoop on your communication is if he sits in a channel between your computer and the remote server. Since KeyScrambler doesn't encrypt this channel (and it simply can't, since the encryption scheme has to be supported on both ends -- meaning both on your computer and the remote server, and KeyScrambler only is on your computer), the presence of KeyScrambler makes no difference: if someone is logging your traffic, he will still be able to, if there's nobody logging your traffic (or if it is already encrypted), then you're safe.
     
  15. Devil's Advocate

    Devil's Advocate Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Posts:
    549
    What protects you from such methods? I think there is no antikeylogger that could past this basic method primative has it is. That's the whole irony of it...
     
  16. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    I don't see the solution to this either, other than "keep the malware from infecting your computer". :)
     
  17. true north

    true north Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Posts:
    159
    Hi TNT,

    regarding anti-keylogger and reliability:
    What do you make out of this:

    PRIVACYKEYBOARD - Anti Keylogger for workstations, small offices and home computers
    question:

    Is that ALL commercial bla bla or something that may be is
    working?
    As you said; there is no such thing as a protecting anti-keylogger because of the need that both sides encryption (sender / receiver).

    TNT, what I'm looking for is privacy protection as many other peoples out there. Would this software as prom missing help o_O
    Thanks in advance for your opinion.

    true north
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 27, 2007
  18. Someguy

    Someguy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Posts:
    31
    Would a SSL encrypted connection (https), which most web sites requiring security would/should use, not prevent any http capturing?

    Or is the capturing (by a trojan f.ex.) done before the SSL encryption part?
     
  19. Someguy

    Someguy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Posts:
    31
  20. Seishin

    Seishin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Posts:
    204
  21. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    14,929
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    @ Someguy, thanks for the link, looks like a nice review. ;)

    Btw, GuardedID is now available for download so perhaps y´all want to check it out. It didn´t work on my virtual machine though, might be a compatibility problem.

    http://www.guardedid.com/default.aspx
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.