KAV vs NOD32 in a network

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by saxofun2, Feb 18, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. saxofun2

    saxofun2 Guest

    I have a network whith 7 workstations (Win200Pro) and 1 server (Win2000Server) that i want to protect.

    KAV propose a more expensive solution than NOD32, but seems more professional. I am wrong?

    KAV propose an additional tool for the gateway...what is the exact use of it?

    KAV propose an other additional tool, called Anti-Hacker. Is it a good tool compared to other product ?

    NOD32 propose an RA edition inside its enterprise edition, is it a strong one compared to KAV or is NOD32 much more for the personnal users?

    I would like to know your opinion of the compared performance of NOD32 enterprise edition (with the RA) and KAV enterprise edition.

    Your experience and knowledges are very appreciated
    Thanks!
     
  2. StarFox

    StarFox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Posts:
    41
    Location:
    Alpha Quadrant
    Kaspersky Anti-Hacker is a firewall.
     
  3. Dan Perez

    Dan Perez Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Posts:
    1,495
    Location:
    Sunny San Diego
    I have not tried the enterprise version of either AV but I have NOD32 and KAV Personal Pro and both are very good. NOD lighter on resources, and possibly better using heuristics (yet with few, if any, false positives) and KAV better on trojans (though NOD is becoming better in this respect).

    KAH is a decent, easy to use firewall but there are many I would consider better.

    I'm sure others will have more pertinent info for you soon :)
     
  4. mrtwolman

    mrtwolman Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Posts:
    613
    What do you want exactly know about NOD32?
     
  5. illukka

    illukka Spyware Fighter

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Posts:
    633
    Location:
    S.A.V.O
    also consider f-secure here..
    https://europe.f-secure.com/estore/multiuser.shtml
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.