KAV Comparations beteween versions

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by larouse, May 11, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. larouse

    larouse Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Posts:
    157
    Hi,

    I would like hear comments about the most low resource KAV Version ?

    Think that 4.5.094 should be the more light version but don't know.

    Thank you,
     
  2. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    For me its the latest 5.0 version without ADS (never tried with ADS) ;)
     
  3. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,873
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    5.0.227 is by far the lightest. with or without ADS it makes no difference.
     
  4. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,010
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    AVP 3.5 is the lightest in terms of memory usage; only one running process which takes up about 2MB VM.

    However, I have found KAV 5 Personal to be the "lightest" in terms of effects on system performance compared to AVP or KAV 4.5.

    This is after tweaking each version to their maximum.
     
  5. larouse

    larouse Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Posts:
    157
    Ok, like understand that KAV v5 has less performance impact ?
     
  6. Infinity

    Infinity Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    2,651
    :eek: :eek: That's amazing...with the same amount of unpackers? prolly the same amount of sigs too...would that be found on the swiss site I presume?...need to check it out and thanx.
    me too I believed that the personal is the lightest.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.