Is Webroot Spysweeper still a great program?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by mvdu, Jan 4, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,151
    Location:
    PA
    Or has it been surpassed by other anti-malware software? I'm thinking of adding it to Prevx and CIS.
     
  2. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    dont use it, its never been very good for me, heavy and there's better options out there.
     
  3. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,151
    Location:
    PA
    Thanks for the reply. With just Prevx and CIS, I'm likely fine anyway. But I thought if it was still good, it would be a nice extra.
     
  4. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    prevx and CIS should do you very good, just those 2 is fine.
     
  5. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    Concour with FirZen.I first used it when I joined wilders then relized How bloated it was and heavy on my system.I can not say for sure if its the same but it was heading for the worse when I left it.besides with your current set up IMO you do not need it.
     
  6. SIR****TMG

    SIR****TMG Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    757
    I still use it and have for 4 years , but only on demand scanner only. I have the whole suite.:thumb:
     
  7. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    Is it heavy realtime.
     
  8. SIR****TMG

    SIR****TMG Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    757
    Yes its still heavy
     
  9. Sportscubs1272

    Sportscubs1272 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Posts:
    340
    Most antivirus programs these days handle anti-spyware and ad-ware fine. I use SAS free or the free version of A-Squared to double check my systems.
     
  10. EliteKiller

    EliteKiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Posts:
    1,138
    Location:
    TX
    Spy Sweeper is a has been along with some other well known applications. It's bloated, has lackluster detection/removal capabilities, and it operates on a subscription model so in the long run you'll pay a premium in order to use it.
     
  11. vijayind

    vijayind Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Posts:
    1,413
    IMO, Webroot should diversify into SpySweeper Brand Toilet Paper ....

    SS is a dinosaur, that refuses to evolve. Its already lost many of its star employees and the equity firms that run it are just milking the name till the last drop. After which it will probably be sold out.
     
  12. Someone

    Someone Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Posts:
    1,106
    I suggest using SAS, MBAM or A-squared as on-demand scanners instead.
     
  13. Perman

    Perman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Posts:
    2,160
    Hi, all

    SpySweeper may not be the darling in views of Tech guys/gals any more, but in the eyes of average joes/janes, it is still a BUY item, so long as its marketing tactics still prevails. Why ?

    Just look around those high tec stores such as FutureShops ( Staples) / in Canada, you will find Webbroots products under heavy promotions-- a perfect opportunity for those who do not know where to get online softwares to gain an access.

    I still have several unused licenses which I got for free a while ago. And they may be hidden somewhere. :p

    Yes, Spysweeper is NOT a MUST HAVE item anymore, it may manage to advance one inch, while others already hop few feet. That is the Evolution, you may say.
     
  14. andyman35

    andyman35 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    2,336
    I very much doubt that SS would add anything to those others apart from system bloat.As mentioned use SAS or Mbam if you want another second opinion scanner.
     
  15. Fly

    Fly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Posts:
    2,069
    I recommend that you don't add it to your security setup. It used to be good, but newer versions (even those without antivirus and behaviour blocker), can tax your computer, have conflicts with other software, and have privacy implications that you don't want. (Default, unless changed recently: installation of ask.com toolbar, sending information to Webroot or other parties which you might not want).

    I have an older version (=fewer problems) on my computer, but don't plan to renew it.

    It's a 'has been'.
     
  16. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,151
    Location:
    PA
    Thanks, all. Based on the opinions, I will not bother to renew it (it's been so long I might have to buy again.)
     
  17. Fly

    Fly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Posts:
    2,069
    In my experience (version without antivirus) the on-demand scanner performs poorly.

    I once had a setup of the Spyware Doctor (before they came out with version 5) plus the Spy Sweeper, both with real-time protection enabled.

    The Spy Sweeper performed (very) well in terms of real-time protection.
    But as an on-demand scanner, it almost never found anything, except perhaps a few false positives. The Spyware Doctor did detect a lot of spyware/adware, so I used that one for on-demand scans. Again, this was a few years ago. These days I virtually never get malware on my computer.
     
  18. randomjester

    randomjester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Posts:
    6
    TopTenREVIEWS:
    2009 Anti-Spyware Software Product Comparisons
    #1 - Spy Sweeper
    #2 - CounterSpy
    #3 - Spyware Doctor

    I've been a fan of Spy Sweeper and highly recommend it. It has always found and removed spyware that others either never found or couldn't successfully remove. It is rated #1 at TopTenREVIEWS, and is actually always ranked high in comparisons. I know Spyware Doctor has a detection rate up there with Spy Sweeper, but Spyware Doctor takes a heavy toll on system resources if you keep real-time protection enabled. I'm currently giving CounterSpy a test...
     
  19. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    Toptenreviews is acomplete joke
     
  20. Fly

    Fly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Posts:
    2,069
    Toptenreviews is little more than an ad site.

    I must admit that in the past I've used it to make a decision, but now I know better :)

    Still, the negative reviews may be of merit !

    There is also a chance that you may find a bargain over there (lower price or free extra program) .
     
  21. Pleonasm

    Pleonasm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Posts:
    1,201
    For a recent, credible and independent review of Spy Sweeper, see: Webroot AntiVirus with AntiSpyware 6.0.

    Personally, I use Spy Sweeper as a supplementary on-demand malware scanner (i.e., no real-time shield protection) in conjunction with Norton Internet Security 2009.
     
  22. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    I wuldnt call pcmag all that credible, their reviews give a nice general outline of the product, but i definetly wuldnt make a choice from a pcmag review
     
  23. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    ROFL---------
     
  24. SIR****TMG

    SIR****TMG Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    757
    Plus the fact the real owner died in Hawaii last year. Who's running the show now?
     
  25. jrmhng

    jrmhng Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2007
    Posts:
    1,268
    Location:
    Australia
    Agreed. They review on a feature and price point basis which is totally inappropriate for security software.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.