is this true???

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Superman20, Apr 12, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Superman20

    Superman20 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Posts:
    39
    has anyone seen this (http://www.eset.com.sg/comparison/). Contrary to av comparatives eset claims that its antivirus is 9% more effective at proactive detection than avira antivir premium. Is this true or it is a misprint?
     
  2. AvinashR

    AvinashR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    2,060
    Location:
    New Delhi Metallo β-Lactamase 1
    Its just a marketing tactics ...nothing more then that.
     
  3. 3GUSER

    3GUSER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Posts:
    812
    A complete lie , actually

    As the graphic says the results are based on independant testing organisations but as you might see , ESET takes results from year 2008 and 2009 . ESET should come back to reality because results from end of 2009 and 2010 show quite the contrary. ESET is neither the fastest , nor the lightest and its proactive detection is not the very best as it used to be in 2008.
     
  4. LowWaterMark

    LowWaterMark Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Posts:
    17,875
    Location:
    New England
    This was already posted and discussed in detail earlier this year...

    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=263156

    Nothing has changed since then, including the SWF file.

    For those who believe in Marketing, no explanation is necessary.
    For those who do not believe in it, no explanation is possible.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.