is there any new Separated on-demand test for F-Secure ?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by on-demand, Sep 6, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. on-demand

    on-demand Guest

  2. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,818
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    no. at least not from av-comparatives.
     
  3. on-demand

    on-demand Guest

    please ibk can you give us Separated on-demand test for F-Secure ?
    because many people use this AV
     
  4. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    As such, F-Secure uses KAV engine, so the detection rate will be similar to KAV at the very minimum. F-Secure has two in-house engines too, so I think the result will be slightly better than KAV.
     
  5. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    Actually the few test's i have seen with twinengined AV's with the Kav engine (including F-Secure) showed them to have slightly less detection :eek:..........weird. :)
     
  6. Mack Jones

    Mack Jones Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Posts:
    174
    Location:
    France
  7. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,818
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    It has more or less the same detection rate. Does it make any difference if it does detect e.g. 5-10 samples more or less than KAV in a test-set of e.g. 500.000 samples? Probably not :p
    Anyway it is possible that in future also f-secure will be tested...
     
  8. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,010
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    And GDATA's AVK?
     
  9. 562562

    562562 Guest

    As somebody from Kav already said here KAV original is the best while ll other packages lack a bit because KAV is not crazy to make them same effective as original....
     
  10. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,818
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    @blackcat: everything could be possible, but i have to discuss with the av companies before i am going to take decisions. and of course i have to look if they want, if i can, if they fulfill various conditions, etc.
    we will see...
     
  11. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    I guess its because F-Secure does not have the hourly updates that KAV enjoys, which allows KAV to have better detection in most tests. :)
     
  12. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    I don't think so. In my mind if KAV is better than F-secure in some test, it's better mainly because there are some Adware/Riskware samples within that test as F-secure doesn't have any Extended databases in their av to choose.

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
  13. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    F-Secure does have Ad-Aware database integrated into their AV.....
     
  14. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    Which is not integrated to the F-secure scanning report. F-secure's Ad-Aware reports by itself.

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
  15. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    I guess that explains it. :)
     
  16. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    When you want to know the detecting rate of F-secure as a total, you have to scan all those samples with F-secure first, remove those infected/suspicious (if not FP:s) ones and finally scan those rest with F-secure Ad-Aware. This result is that what we can compare to KAV scanning result with extended database enabled.

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
  17. illukka

    illukka Spyware Fighter

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Posts:
    633
    Location:
    S.A.V.O
    one possible explanation is that AFAIK f-secure hasnt got the latest kav engine
     
  18. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    Yes, and who knows what they have done with it, in terms of the modefications they have made to it etc.
     
  19. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    Firefighter

    I think you are wrong here, because they add their own signatures in addition to the ones they get from Kaspersky. :)
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2005
  20. Cadoul

    Cadoul Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    76
    Location:
    France
    In some place, you can't see difference between Kav pro 4.5.0.104 and Kav pro 5.0. The engines are different. Then which engine is used by F-secure?
    Sincerly,
    Cadoul from France
     
  21. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    Maybe I have to clear up my opinion a bit more. I didn't mean that F-secure has the same detection rate as KAV with extended database. When I trialed ShawSecure (the same as FIS 2005), I had to scan my samples with F-secure Ad-Aware too, to get the best possible scanning results with that ShawSecure, where was that add module within.

    Actually I believe that F-secure has even a bit better detection rate among viruses and worms than KAV, because of those 3 engines (or was it now 4 engines?), but KAV may have a bit better detection rate among trojan like nasties, because of a bit better unpacking capabilies than F-secure has and a bit quicker updates together with extended databases too.

    PS. Despite of a bit different detection rates of F-secure and KAV, it has only an academical importance, because the second best scanning engines than KAV, concerning detection rates, are far below of those two F-secure/KAV, than there is difference between those two.

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2005
  22. illukka

    illukka Spyware Fighter

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Posts:
    633
    Location:
    S.A.V.O
    i havent used f-secure since 2004 beta, but i believe it has still kav 4.xx engine.
     
  23. Technodrome

    Technodrome Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    2,140
    Location:
    New York
    F-secure uses KAV 6.xx engine.



    tECHNODROME
     
  24. .....

    ..... Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Posts:
    312
    How you know that? The KAV 6.xx engine is still a while off being finished.
     
  25. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    I believe it was posted earlier. Maybe F-Secure uses some pre-release version of the KAV 6.x engine. :doubt:
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.