Integrity of NOD32 installers

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by lucas1985, Sep 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    A simple question:
    I've checked the integrity of the installers of NOD32 trial versions (Win9x and Win2000/XP) with WinRAR (version 3.30) and 7-Zip (version 4.20) and both report that the installers are corrupt. WinRAR shows the following message (translated from Spanish):
    "The authenticity information is not valid or is damaged"
    "The header of file "o_O" is damaged"
    I've downloaded both installers from multiple locations (NOD32 Argentina, NOD32 Uruguay, NOD32 Latin America) and I always get the same message. However, both install fine with zero errors.
    Checksums (MD5):
    - ne98spst.exe (2.70.39): 5674feb9ff940d79f88830bd2010823b
    - nentspst.exe (2.70.39): 37dd74f975bdcb9ec1e41eb74f9cfcd7
    Is this a normal/expected behaviour? Is this a bug in those (old) versions of WinRAR and 7-Zip?
    Thanks
     
  2. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    I get the same errors with WinRAR 3.70 but the files extract fine.
     
  3. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    Thanks WSFuser. So, it seems that it's a normal behaviour of WinRAR.
     
  4. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    This is absolutely normal and was confirmed by Marcos some time ago ( I can't find it right now) . WinRAR has problems when dealing with digitally signed stuff , AFAIK.
     
  5. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    Thanks HiTech_boy. I found this post by Marcos confirming your statement :)
     
  6. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    That is what I meant :D
     
  7. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    A FAQ entry should be added regarding this topic. What do you think?
     
  8. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,174
    Location:
    Denmark
    WinRAR always reports the file as damaged because it doesn't support the "extra information" provided. Basically it's to ensure that Windows (2000) & Vista gets the extra information it needs - Believe me I've asked the same question once since I was baffled why the installer was broke when I used WinRAR. It's perfectly normal and shouldn't be any concern.
     
  9. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    Thanks to all :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.