image upload test

Discussion in 'Test Forum' started by overangry, Jul 24, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    testing
     

    Attached Files:

  2. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    Re: immage upload test

    testing reply
     

    Attached Files:

  3. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    Re: immage upload test

    testtest
     

    Attached Files:

  4. GlobalForce

    GlobalForce Regular Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Posts:
    3,581
    Location:
    Garden State, USA
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2009
  5. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    Again thanks...
    This image: 2009-07-29_123823.png (126.5 KB)
     

    Attached Files:

  6. GlobalForce

    GlobalForce Regular Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Posts:
    3,581
    Location:
    Garden State, USA
    Weight won't matter with a fast connect. Users on dial-up, less appreciative. A consideration we can be conscious of.

    Sixty-four percent knock-down:

    prevx_45kb.gif

    Seventy-four (@ half quality):

    prevx_33kb.jpg
     
  7. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    Point taken, I'll reduce the images in future:D
     
  8. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    2009-07-30_154331.png (47.4 KB),
     

    Attached Files:

  9. GlobalForce

    GlobalForce Regular Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Posts:
    3,581
    Location:
    Garden State, USA
    prevx_thmbnl.jpg

    Was it your screen tool that handled the resize?
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2009
  10. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    No it was Prish Image Resizer, don't no why I cant resize the image to achieve a legible result..
    The best result I achieve is about 160KB if I knock down the weight the I have a smaller image.
    Fiddled with it for a few hours...
    I can't reproduce your results

    What could I be doing wrongo_O
     
  11. GlobalForce

    GlobalForce Regular Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Posts:
    3,581
    Location:
    Garden State, USA
    You take screenshots using which program?
     
  12. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
  13. GlobalForce

    GlobalForce Regular Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Posts:
    3,581
    Location:
    Garden State, USA
    I've got a suspicion you're unaware how to swap the output format. As an experiment follow my lead .... select "autosave" and "preview in editor" from it's drop-down. Take a random shot and settings'll open > autosave > jpg format > quality 80 > color subsampling. These last two you can trial & error for results. Now try a shot'a that thing you got in our fifth post.

    PS - You're not gonna reproduce my results without the best. @ a forty-three meg install, she has no substitute!
     
  14. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    test jpg Q=80 Better Qual.png (124.6 KB)
     

    Attached Files:

  15. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    test jpg q=50 high(small file size.jpg (51.1 KB)
    Thank you kindly.

    Finally figured it out with your help. Almost no loss in quality, great

    I will accept this quality
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 1, 2009
  16. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    test jpg q=30 high(small file size).jpg (28.9 KB)
     

    Attached Files:

  17. GlobalForce

    GlobalForce Regular Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Posts:
    3,581
    Location:
    Garden State, USA
    Ere'ya go! Maybe an updated nick - 'lil less angry? Say, you currently trialing or have you purchased?
     
  18. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    Trialing, has all I need.
     
  19. GlobalForce

    GlobalForce Regular Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Posts:
    3,581
    Location:
    Garden State, USA
    From an "ease of use" standpoint, HoverSnap and this baby were the other reasonably cool standalones I liked. The former, simplicity king, the latter, jpg only, but with better than average results. No reason to fuss over needless adjustments. Dial in your preliminaries and let'er rip!

    148kb_2_39kb.jpg

    Here's an additional aspect you can make use of after uploading your image of choice. Hit "preview changes" 'cause you won't be able to see what you need to until that's taken care of. Now back under the main header "additional options," you'll find these
    ___________________________

    Should you ever need to deliver a larger than usual post, GroverH provides a superb example. All you do then is supply the link.

    Oh yeah, 5.3'll take care'a nearly everything the current version does, including scroll capture - FREE!
     
  20. Marja

    Marja Honestly, I'm not a bot!!

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    In the Vast Fields of My Mind
    Those are some great tips, GF!

    I got some relatives that could really use that PIcs4mail..
    They send HUGE pics thru the mail..megabytes for one little picture!

    Hoversnap is a great one to use too and really easy.

    Haven't tried Faststone but likin' the look of it...

    Another one that is a little more involved is Irfanview...
    but from what I have heard Faststone is just as good.

    Wish I would have known about Faststone scroll capturing before my yahoo site went down.. bummer!

    Like Grover's tips on posting also...didn't even know it existed! :thumb:
     
  21. GlobalForce

    GlobalForce Regular Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Posts:
    3,581
    Location:
    Garden State, USA
    If taken for later use, you know, something where high resolutions important, then that Pics4Mail application would be perfect, provided their intentions don't involve "batching" these things. If nothing more than sharing quick, random shots amongst friends and relatives, their camera should have a sizing adjustment. You and I know digital cameras produce big FILES, it's peeps on fast boxes with quick connects that don't correlate time with size.

    Paint.NET, Photoscape (slow home page on dial-up) - review / portable with reviews, Picasa (screenies on this invasive site), Resize2Mail, Windows Live Photo Gallery plus the onboard email apps are other avenues you could explore for'em - if YOU ;) spent more time on Win.
     
  22. Marja

    Marja Honestly, I'm not a bot!!

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    In the Vast Fields of My Mind
    That's the rub, don't spend any time on Doze...

    I will gather some pics and check them all out on Win.

    Right now the resize2mail sounds perfect for
    peeps that don't want to mess with a prog...they can resize, save and send!

    I think peeps rarely bother to resize 'in cam', they send pics thinking they are going
    to be the size they get at the photo shops- 3 x 5 usually.....

    I used to love PIcasa too, but it's too invasive now.:cautious:
    (FYI: Supposedly you can still use the older versions and they don't send your info "home',
    haven't used it in a couple years.)

    Thanks for searching all those progs out, GF! ;)

    Let ya know which ones they actually USE! :D
     
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2009
  23. GlobalForce

    GlobalForce Regular Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Posts:
    3,581
    Location:
    Garden State, USA
    Which ones they use huh ... that'autta be a treat! I kinda think if I were on Win I might've taken a liking to that Photoscape thingy.
     
  24. JRViejo

    JRViejo Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    20,981
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    GF, I use Photoscape as a quick, down and dirty, pic manipulator (I work with Macromedia Fireworks as well) and it's a great program! :thumb:

    Thanks for that Pics4Mail link; some of my family members can use it to downsize their emails, if you know what I mean. ;)
     
  25. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    Pics4mail is a great little app... I'll definitely be using it:thumb:
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.